Electrostatic Inkjet Nozzle Meniscus Control
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Conventional liquid ejection apparatuses face challenges in efficiently ejecting high-viscosity inks due to suboptimal electrostatic suction force utilization, leading to increased drive voltage requirements, cost, and issues like tailoring, misting, and satellite droplet formation, which are not effectively addressed by existing technologies.
Innovation Solution
A liquid ejection apparatus with a nozzle plate having a nozzle with an internal diameter of 15 μm or less, a pressure generation device forming a meniscus with a height of 1.3 times the nozzle radius, and an electrostatic voltage application system, combined with a counter electrode to concentrate the electric field effectively, preventing tailoring and satellite formation.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Productivity
If the drive voltage is increased to eject high-viscosity ink through a fine nozzle, then the ejection capability is improved, but the cost of the head and apparatus increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces the conventional mechanical pressure-driven inkjet system with an electrostatic field-based ejection system. A charging electrode applies electrostatic charge to the ink, and a suction electrode creates an electrostatic suction force that ejects the ink droplets. This substitution of mechanical pressure with electrostatic forces enables high-viscosity ink ejection through fine nozzles without requiring high drive voltages, thereby reducing manufacturing costs while maintaining ejection capability.
2Productivity
If the applied voltage is raised to increase the electrostatic suction force, then the ejection efficiency is improved, but insulation breakdown occurs between the head and substrate
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies local quality by concentrating the electrostatic suction force specifically at the ink meniscus region through the suction electrode positioned near the nozzle. Rather than applying high voltage across the entire head-substrate gap, the electrostatic field is localized to where it is needed (at the ink surface), enabling effective ejection while maintaining insulation elsewhere. This localized field application prevents insulation breakdown while achieving high ejection efficiency.
3Manufacturing precision
If the conventional inkjet recording method is used to form a fine pattern, then the nozzle size is reduced, but the drive voltage must be increased
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces the pressure-based mechanical ejection mechanism with an electrostatic field-based mechanism. The charging electrode electrostatically charges the ink, and the suction electrode creates an electrostatic suction force that ejects the ink through fine nozzles. This substitution eliminates the need for high drive voltages even when using very fine nozzles for high-definition patterns, thereby achieving both fine pattern formation and low energy consumption.
4Productivity
If the electrostatic suction force is not maximally utilized, then the meniscus formation is inefficient, but increasing the voltage causes insulation breakdown
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies preliminary action by first charging the ink with the charging electrode before applying the electrostatic suction force. This pre-charging of the ink meniscus ensures that when the suction electrode is activated, the electrostatic suction force is maximally effective from the outset, achieving efficient meniscus formation and droplet ejection without requiring excessive voltage that would cause insulation breakdown.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
This configuration ensures stable ejection of single liquid droplets without mist or satellite formation, improving ejection stability and image quality while reducing energy consumption and apparatus costs.
Implementation Method 1
a pressure generation device for forming the meniscus of liquid and for generating pressure inside the nozzle
Implementation Method 2
liquid is ejected by the electrostatic suction force generated between the liquid in the nozzle applied by the ejection voltage application device and the counter electrode
Data Source
AI summary
In a liquid ejection apparatus, having: a liquid ejection head having, a nozzle plate having a nozzle to eject liquid, a cavity to reserve liquid ejected form a ejection hole of the nozzle, a pressure generating device to form a meniscus of the liquid, and a ejecting voltage applying device to apply a ejection voltage to the liquid in the nozzle; a operation control device to control application a drive voltage to drive the pressure generating device and application of the ejection voltage by the ejection voltage applying device; and a counter electrode opposite to the liquid ejection head; wherein in the liquid ejection device in which the liquid is ejected by a static electric attraction force generated between the liquid in the nozzle to which a voltage is applied by the ejection voltage applying device and the counter electrode, and by a pressure generated in the nozzle, the pressure generating device to form the liquid meniscus forms the meniscus having a height of equal to or more than 1.3 times a radius of the nozzle on the ejection hole of the nozzle.


