Optimizing Electrostatic Separators for Granule Purity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electrostatic separating devices for mixed granular materials, particularly from industrial waste, face inefficiencies in separating materials of similar densities, resulting in high rates of unseparated material and lower purity, with only 50% to 65% separation in a single pass and a required purity of 95%.

Innovation Solution

A method for designing an electrostatic separating device that optimizes device parameters such as collection area geometry and operating conditions using a computer-aided approach, including modeling granule trajectories and charge distributions, to enhance sorting performance by optimizing parameters like divider positions, granule purity, and electrical charges, thereby improving separation efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If electrostatic separating devices are used to sort mixed granular materials, then separation of materials with similar densities is achieved, but the separation efficiency is insufficient with only 50% to 65% separation in a single pass and high rates of unseparated material

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation efficiencyVSAvoidpurity of separated material
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by using a vibrating or rotating device to charge granules via triboelectric effect before they enter the electrostatic sorting device. This pre-charging step ensures that all granules are properly charged before separation, improving the overall separation efficiency and reducing unseparated material rates while maintaining high purity in the sorted outputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the number of compartments in the collection area is increased to optimize purity, then the purity of separated material is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurity of separated materialVSAvoidnumber of compartments
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically optimizing the number of compartments, their positions, and dimensions as design parameters. Through computer-aided optimization, the method determines the optimal configuration of collection area parameters that achieves the required purity levels while minimizing the number of compartments needed, thus reducing device complexity while maintaining separation effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If computer-aided optimization of device parameters is implemented, then separation efficiency and purity are significantly improved, but the device design and manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation efficiencyVSAvoiddesign and manufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies copying by using computer simulations and mathematical models to create virtual representations of the electrostatic separating device and its operation. These digital models allow for optimization of device parameters without requiring multiple physical prototypes, significantly reducing design and manufacturing costs while achieving improved separation efficiency through virtual testing and optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method significantly improves the separation efficiency of electrostatic separating devices, achieving better purity and reduced unseparated material rates, with results showing reproducibility to the nearest tenth of a percent and the ability to separate multiple materials in a single step.

Implementation Method 1

In a first step, the granules are charged by triboelectric effect in a vibrating or rotating device.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTriboelectric effect: Triboelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

In a second step, the charged granules are conveyed to an electrostatic sorting device where they are separated by an electric field.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic separation: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 3

the charged granules are conveyed to an electrostatic sorting device where they are separated by an electric field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric field: Electric Field

Implementation Method 4

The positively charged granules are attracted to the anode (the negative electrode), while the negatively charged granules are attracted to the cathode (the positive electrode).

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic attraction: Ion Repulsion/Attraction

Data Source

PatentUS12019962B2Method for designing an electrostatic separating device of a mixture of different material granules and associated devices
Publication Date: 2024.06.25 SKYTECH
  • US12019962B2 patent drawing
  • US12019962B2 patent drawing
  • US12019962B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for designing one part of an electrostatic separating device of a mixture of different material granules, the method including providing a sorting performance value to be met by the device when at least one predefined mixture is introduced into the device to be sorted, optimizing a value of at least one parameter of the set of parameters relating to the device part by using an optimization technique, the optimization technique including the use of a sorting performance model of the device, and the optimization technique occurring under the constraint that the sorting performed by the device has the given sorting performance value.