Electrostatic Separator Upstream Collector Grid

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional electrostatic separators or precipitators face challenges in efficiency, compactness, energy utilization, ozone emissions, ease of cleaning and servicing, and scalability for different air flow rates and geometries.

Innovation Solution

The electrostatic separator or precipitator incorporates an upstream collector element, such as a grid or mesh, arranged upstream of the spray ionization source and applied with a negative potential, which enhances particle separation efficiency and reduces ozone emissions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional electrostatic separators use high voltage corona discharges for particle charging, then particle separation efficiency is improved, but ozone emissions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle separation efficiencyVSAvoidozone emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the voltage parameter from conventional high voltage (several kV) to a lower voltage range (1-10 kV), which reduces ozone generation while maintaining adequate particle separation efficiency. This parameter optimization allows the separator to achieve effective particle charging and collection without excessive ozone emissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a virtual electrode concept where the electrode structure is replicated or mirrored to create complementary electric field patterns. This virtual electrode approach allows for more efficient particle charging with lower voltage requirements, thereby reducing ozone generation while maintaining separation performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If electrostatic separators operate continuously for air purification, then air quality maintenance is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair quality maintenanceVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic voltage adjustment where the operating voltage is continuously optimized based on particle load conditions. The system can adjust voltage levels dynamically to maintain effective particle separation while minimizing energy consumption during low-particle-load periods, thereby reducing overall power consumption while ensuring continuous air quality maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor particle concentration and separator performance in real-time. This feedback information is used to optimize voltage settings and operational parameters, ensuring the system operates at maximum efficiency and minimizes energy consumption while maintaining reliable air purification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If the separator is designed for high particle capture efficiency, then air purification performance is improved, but device size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair purification performanceVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes three-dimensional electrode configurations and vertical particle migration paths to enhance capture efficiency without proportionally increasing the horizontal footprint. By optimizing the vertical dimension and using multi-level collector structures, the system achieves high particle capture efficiency while maintaining a compact overall device size suitable for residential applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Productivity

If high voltage is applied to the ionization source, then particle charging efficiency is improved, but energy losses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle charging efficiencyVSAvoidelectrical energy losses
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the voltage parameter to operate within a lower range (1-10 kV) compared to conventional systems, which reduces electrical energy losses and improves charging efficiency. This parameter optimization ensures that the energy input is sufficient for effective particle charging while minimizing wasteful energy dissipation through corona discharges and other loss mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12303913B2Electrostatic separator
Publication Date: 2025.05.20 SCHMITZ OLIVER
  • US12303913B2 patent drawing
  • US12303913B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electrostatic separator or precipitator through which an air stream to be cleaned of particles flows in a longitudinal direction includes at least one electrospray ionization source, which is supplied with a positive potential and can be implemented, for example, by the tips of a graphite fiber bundle, and a collector unit arranged downstream for particle separation and having parallel collector and driver plates. The ion flow from the corona zone is additionally homogenized and spread by an upstream collector element, in particular a collector grid, upstream of the at least one electrospray ionization source, so that high particle separation rates can be achieved with minimal ozone emissions. Alternatively, or in addition, the ion flow from the corona zone can be homogenized downstream of the at least one spray ionization source by one or more border counter-electrodes.