Electrostatic IG Shade Conductivity Zoning for Extension Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current window technologies fail to effectively balance energy efficiency and human comfort, particularly in insulating glass units, as they lead to excessive heating and cooling while not fully utilizing natural daylight and solar gain, and lack dynamic control for privacy and energy management.

Innovation Solution

The integration of electrically controllable shades within insulating glass units, featuring conductive coatings, dielectric films, and polymer substrates that extend and retract using electrostatic forces, allowing for dynamic control of radiation transmission and privacy, with a focus on reducing energy waste and enhancing aesthetic appeal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If static or passive low-emissivity coatings are used to reduce U-value, then energy insulation is improved, but dynamic control capability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy insulationVSAvoiddynamic control capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the dynamics principle by transforming static low-E coatings into dynamically controllable electrostatic shades. The shade system can transition between extended and retracted positions based on applied voltage, enabling dynamic adjustment of radiation transmission while maintaining the insulating properties of the low-E coatings on the glass substrates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by varying the electrical voltage applied to the conductive coatings on the shade and glass substrates. By changing the voltage parameter, the electrostatic forces are adjusted, allowing the shade to extend or retract, thereby dynamically controlling the level of radiation transmission and energy insulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If spectrally selective low-E coatings are used to reduce solar heat gain, then cooling energy loss is improved, but flexibility in privacy control is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling energy lossVSAvoidprivacy control flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by creating a movable shade system that can be extended or retracted on demand. This dynamic capability provides flexible privacy control while the spectrally selective low-E coatings on the glass substrates continue to reduce solar heat gain, addressing both energy efficiency and operational flexibility requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies segmentation by separating the functions of solar heat gain reduction (handled by the spectrally selective low-E coatings on the glass) from privacy control (handled by the movable electrostatic shade). This functional segmentation allows each component to optimize its specific function while working together to solve the overall problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If electrostatic forces are increased to improve shade extension speed, then productivity is improved, but control precision near the closed position deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshade extension speedVSAvoidcontrol precision near closed position
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a non-uniform conductive coating pattern on the glass substrate, with different conductivity regions (first, second, and third conductive coatings with different sheet resistances). This allows different zones to provide different levels of electrostatic force, enabling both rapid extension and precise positioning near the closed state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by varying the sheet resistance of conductive coatings in different regions of the glass substrate. By changing the electrical resistance parameter across different zones, the electrostatic force distribution is optimized to provide both high-speed extension and precise control near the closed position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of manufacture

If uniform conductive coatings are used across the entire glass surface, then manufacturing simplicity is improved, but electrostatic force distribution uniformity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoating application simplicityVSAvoidelectrostatic force distribution uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by dividing the glass surface into multiple zones with different conductive coating properties. The first, second, and third conductive coatings are applied to different regions with specific sheet resistance values, creating localized variations in electrostatic force generation to achieve uniform overall force distribution despite manufacturing complexities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes composite materials by combining multiple conductive coating layers with different electrical properties on the same glass substrate. This composite structure of conductive coatings allows for tailored electrostatic force distribution across different regions, balancing manufacturing feasibility with performance requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides improved energy efficiency by dynamically controlling radiation transmission, reducing energy consumption, and offering on-demand privacy while maintaining a pleasing aesthetic appearance, thus addressing the limitations of existing window technologies.

Implementation Method 1

The first and/or second conductive coatings are electrically connectable to a power source that is controllable to set up an electric potential difference and create electrostatic forces to drive the polymer substrate to the shutter closed position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic forces: Electrostatics

Data Source

PatentEP4100609B1Electrostatically driven shade with improved shade extension control, and/or associated methods
Publication Date: 2023.12.20 GUARDIAN GLASS LLC
  • EP4100609B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP4100609B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5
  • EP4100609B1 patent drawingFigure 6A~7

AI summary

Certain example embodiments relate to electric, potentially-driven shades usable with insulating glass (IG) units, IG units including such shades, and/or associated methods. In such a unit, a dynamic shade is located between the substrates defining the IG unit, and is movable between retracted and extended positions. The dynamic shade includes on-glass layers including a transparent conductor and an insulator or dielectric film, as well as a shutter. The shutter includes a resilient polymer, a conductor, and optional ink. The shutter extends towards a bottom stopper in a controlled manner by virtue of a conductivity difference that is introduced in an area proximate to the bottom stopper. This conductivity difference affects the electrostatic forces in that area in a manner that can be used to alter shutter extension speed.