Electrostatic Weed Spraying With Image-Guided Chemical Targeting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current weed control methods, especially in industrial and railway areas, are inefficient and environmentally costly due to the need for extensive manual effort and the use of herbicides, which can have negative environmental impacts.

Innovation Solution

A weed control apparatus equipped with an input unit, processing unit, and high voltage power supply that atomizes and electrically charges weed control chemicals, using image analysis to target and attract the charged spray to weeds, reducing chemical usage and improving efficacy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual weed control methods are used, then weed control can be performed, but it is very time and resource consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweed control efficiencyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical weed control with an automated electrostatic spraying system. The system uses electrical fields to charge and direct herbicide particles, substituting human labor with automated detection and spraying mechanisms that operate continuously at high speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service operation through automated image recognition and processing. The processing unit automatically detects weeds, calculates optimal spray parameters, and controls the electrostatic spray units without continuous human intervention, allowing the system to service itself during operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If herbicide is sprayed to control vegetation, then weed control is achieved, but the general public increasingly wishes to see a reduction in environmental impact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweed control effectivenessVSAvoidenvironmental impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies herbicide locally and selectively only to detected weed locations rather than broad-area spraying. The electrostatic spray units target specific weed positions identified by image processing, reducing overall chemical application and environmental impact while maintaining effective weed control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the physical parameters of herbicide delivery by using electrostatic charging of spray particles. This enables precise control of droplet size, charge, and trajectory, allowing efficient deposition on weeds with minimal chemical usage and reduced environmental footprint

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If electrostatic charging is applied to the spray, then chemical usage is reduced and coverage is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechemical usageVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system integrates multiple functions into unified components. The electrostatic spray units simultaneously perform charging, atomization, and directional control of herbicide particles. The processing unit handles image acquisition, analysis, and spray control in one integrated system, reducing overall complexity despite enhanced functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces chemical usage by targeting weeds with electrostatically charged sprays, increasing coverage and reducing environmental impact while maintaining efficiency on moving platforms.

Implementation Method 1

The at least one high voltage power supply and the at least one chemical spray unit are configured to hold the at least one part of the at least one chemical spray unit at at least one high voltage with respect to zero volts potential, such that the atomized liquid weed control chemical is electrically charged

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical charging: Electrostatic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The weeds growing on the ground will be at ground potential, substantially at zero volts, and an atomized liquid weed control 'spray' will be attracted to the weeds

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic attraction: Electrostatics

Data Source

PatentUS12075768B2Weed control apparatus
Publication Date: 2024.09.03 DISCOVERY PURCHASER CORP
  • US12075768B2 patent drawing
  • US12075768B2 patent drawing
  • US12075768B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A weed control apparatus for a vehicle includes a processing unit that receives at least one image of an environment. The processing unit analyses the at least one image to activate at least one chemical spray unit. A liquid weed control chemical is atomized and charged by the at least one chemical spray unit. The at least one chemical spray unit has at least one part configured to be held at high voltage with respect to zero volts potential. The at least one high voltage power supply and the at least one chemical spray unit are configured to hold the at least one part of the at least one chemical spray unit at one or a number of high voltages with respect to zero volts potential, such that the atomized liquid weed control chemical is electrically charged.