Elevating Walker Chair Manual Lifting Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional assistive devices for individuals with mobility difficulties, such as walkers and wheelchairs, often restrict user interaction with the environment, require significant user effort to rise from a seated to a standing position, and fail to promote natural gait and independence in daily activities.

Innovation Solution

A foldable, elevating walker chair with a height adjustment mechanism, innovative bracing struts, telescoping wheel mounts, and a folding mechanism that allows for compact configuration and use as a walking support, incorporating features like a swivel seat, hinges, seatbelt, and safety mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If conventional walkers are used to add support and stability, then user stability is improved, but user freedom of movement and ability to carry objects deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser stabilityVSAvoiduser freedom of movement
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The device is divided into two functional segments: a walker portion for stability and a wheelchair portion for mobility and capacity. This segmentation allows users to benefit from both support and freedom of movement by switching between or combining the functions of each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The hybrid device serves multiple functions: it provides walker-level stability when needed, wheelchair-level mobility and carrying capacity when needed, and can transition between these states. This multi-functionality resolves the contradiction by allowing users to access both stability and freedom of movement depending on situational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Speed

If conventional wheelchairs are used to provide mobility, then user mobility is improved, but user physical health and muscular well-being deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser mobilityVSAvoidmuscular well-being
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The device dynamically transitions between passive wheelchair mode and active walking mode. During walking portions, users actively engage their muscles to propel themselves, thereby maintaining muscular well-being while still achieving mobility goals. The system adapts between powered and unpowered states based on user needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If elevating wheelchairs are used to raise occupants to standing position, then user standing capability is improved, but device complexity and weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser standing capabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lifting mechanism is designed to be manually operated by the user themselves rather than requiring complex external motors or assistance systems. This self-service approach enables users to elevate themselves to standing position using simple mechanical advantage, reducing device complexity while maintaining the standing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If stand-up walkers are used to lift occupants, then user standing ability is improved, but user comfort and ease of interaction deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser standing abilityVSAvoiduser comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device separates the lifting function from the seating function, with the wheelchair portion providing a comfortable, well-cushioned seat and the walker portion providing the lifting mechanism. This segmentation allows users to enjoy both standing ability and comfort without the compromises of integrated stand-up walkers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

5Volume of moving object

If foldable mechanism is used to achieve compact configuration, then device portability is improved, but structural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice compactnessVSAvoidfolding mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The folding mechanism is applied separately to different segments of the hybrid device (walker frame and wheelchair frame), allowing each segment to be compacted independently. This segmented approach achieves overall compactness while distributing the mechanical complexity across manageable sections rather than requiring a single complex folding system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12290482B2Elevating walker chair and components
Publication Date: 2025.05.06 EXOKINETICS INC
  • US12290482B2 patent drawing
  • US12290482B2 patent drawing
  • US12290482B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A foldable, elevating walker chair is disclosed having a height adjustment mechanism and a height limiter. The elevating walker chair has a unique lifting mechanism that allows the chair to be readily raised and lowered without motors. The weight of the elevating walker chair may be optimized by use of innovative bracing struts. The folding mechanism allows the elevating walker chair to achieve a compact configuration. Innovative components such as a swivel seat, hinges, seatbelt, telescoping wheel mounts, height adjustment devices and safety mechanisms may be included in the elevating walker chair.