Elevator Access System Dynamic Mode Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current elevator access systems are inflexible, as they either require identification for secure access or operate in anonymous mode, failing to seamlessly integrate both modes, which can be inadequate in various scenarios.

Innovation Solution

An elevator system with an access control method that identifies individuals using sensor data from various devices, switching between personal and anonymous modes based on identification, allowing flexible access control and prioritization of elevator services, even when a remote identification system is unavailable.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the elevator system requires identification for secure access, then security is improved, but flexibility and ease of use deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidflexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The elevator access system dynamically switches between personal mode (requiring identification) and anonymous mode (no identification required) based on real-time sensor data and user presence detection. This dynamic adaptability resolves the contradiction by allowing the system to be secure when needed and flexible when appropriate, rather than being locked into a fixed access mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system integrates multiple identification methods (biometric sensors, RFID readers, facial recognition cameras) and multiple access modes (personal and anonymous) into a single universal access control system. This multi-functionality allows the elevator to serve both security-conscious scenarios and convenience-oriented scenarios without requiring separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If the elevator system operates in anonymous mode, then ease of use is improved, but security deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of useVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts its security level based on the operational context. When operating in anonymous mode for ease of use, it can switch to personal mode when security requirements arise, such as during emergencies or when unauthorized access is detected. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction between ease of use and security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors sensor data, access patterns, and system state to provide feedback that triggers mode switching. When feedback indicates a security concern (e.g., suspicious behavior, emergency situation), the system transitions from anonymous mode to personal mode, thereby maintaining security while preserving ease of use during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system switches between personal and anonymous modes, then flexibility is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple identification technologies (biometric sensors, RFID readers, facial recognition cameras) and control functions into a single integrated access control system. This merging reduces the overall system complexity compared to having separate systems for each identification method, while still providing the flexibility to switch between personal and anonymous modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs an intermediary control unit that manages the switching between personal and anonymous modes based on sensor data and system state. This intermediary layer simplifies the complexity by centralizing the decision-making logic for mode switching, rather than requiring complex coordination between multiple independent subsystems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If identification is required for floor access, then security is improved, but productivity and access speed deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidaccess speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary identification actions before the user actually needs to access the elevator. Sensors detect user presence and pre-process identification data (such as facial recognition or RFID reading) while the user is still approaching, so that when the user reaches the elevator, access can be granted immediately without delay. This preliminary action maintains security while preserving access speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces traditional mechanical key-based access systems with automated sensor-based identification (biometric sensors, RFID readers, facial recognition cameras). This substitution eliminates the need for physical key exchange and manual verification, thereby maintaining security through automated identification while significantly improving access speed and user productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP3290374B1Elevator access system
Publication Date: 2021.04.28 INVENTIO AG
  • EP3290374B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3290374B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3290374B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method for identifying a person by an elevator system (10, 10', 10") comprises: acquiring identification data (48) of the person with an identification device (46); matching the identification data (48) with user profiles (52) of a plurality of persons, which user profiles (52) are stored in an identification database (34); when a user profile (52) is found based on the identification data (48): switching in a personal mode, which is associated with the user profile (52) and interacting with the person in the personal mode; and when no user profile (52) is found: switching in an anonymous mode, and interacting with the person in the anonymous mode.