Elevator Controller Automated Commissioning Check Program

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Elevator installations require complex and error-prone commissioning and acceptance checks due to individualized configurations, leading to potential oversight of necessary steps and documentation challenges, especially with varying legal standards and component specifics.

Innovation Solution

A method where configuration data stored in the elevator controller determines necessary check steps, generating a check program that guides the process through a menu-controlled sequence, ensuring all required inputs are made and comparisons between target and actual values are conducted, reducing human error and documentation needs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional manual checking methods are used for elevator installations, then flexibility to handle individual configurations is maintained, but the complexity and error rate increase due to numerous decision choices and documentation requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of commissioning and acceptance checkingVSAvoidcomplexity of checking process
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The elevator controller performs self-diagnosis and self-guidance during commissioning and acceptance checking. The control unit automatically determines necessary check steps based on stored configuration data, generates check programs, and guides the operator through the process without requiring extensive manual documentation or decision-making about individual configuration requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical checking processes with an automated control system. The controller's processing unit electronically determines check steps, generates check programs, and manages the commissioning and acceptance checking process, substituting the need for manual documentation and physical checklists with digital automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If extensive documentation is maintained for individual elevator configurations, then completeness of checking is ensured, but the time and effort required for commissioning and acceptance checking increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of acceptance checkVSAvoidtime for commissioning and acceptance checking
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The elevator controller pre-stores configuration data and check procedures in its memory before the actual commissioning and acceptance checking occurs. This preliminary preparation of check programs and procedures eliminates the need for real-time documentation creation and reduces the time required during the actual checking process while ensuring complete and reliable verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates digital copies of check procedures, configuration data, and verification steps within the controller's memory and display units. These electronic copies replace physical documentation, allowing the operator to access all necessary checking information instantly without handling extensive paper records, thereby reducing time while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Manufacturing precision

If individualized checking measures are implemented for each elevator configuration, then accuracy of verification is improved, but the number of decision choices and potential errors increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of verificationVSAvoidcomplexity of decision-making process
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit continuously monitors the commissioning and acceptance checking process, providing feedback to guide the operator through predetermined check steps based on the specific elevator configuration. This feedback mechanism ensures precise verification by automatically adjusting the check program according to stored configuration data, eliminating the need for complex manual decision-making while maintaining verification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7344004B2Method of and apparatus for operating an elevator installation in a commissioning operation mode and an acceptance check mode
Publication Date: 2008.03.18 INVENTIO AG
  • US7344004B2 patent drawing
  • US7344004B2 patent drawing
  • US7344004B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of checking elevator installations with a car, an elevator drive and an elevator controller with a memory avoids or at least reduces errors by a person carrying out the check and enables convenient and reliable checking of the elevator installation. A check program including all steps necessary for the check is set up on the basis of stored configuration data of the elevator installation in the elevator controller and in dependence on a selected mode of operation. In addition, the steps are displayed in a predetennined sequence on an indicating and control unit and necessary inputs for working down the steps are input by way of the indicating and control unit.