Elevator Door Dynamic Braking During Power Failure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Elevator doors tend to close abruptly during power outages, causing noise and potential damage due to the lack of braking action, and existing solutions like friction brakes or motor generators are costly or require special designs.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that utilize an electrical buffer connected between the door drive's control unit and power supply to store energy during normal operation, releasing it as backup power during a power outage to control the door's closing movement, allowing the door drive to act as a dynamic brake.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If a friction brake is added to prevent noise during power failure, then noise is reduced, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovenoiseVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The door drive motor serves dual purposes: normal driving function and emergency braking function during power failure. The control unit enables the motor to act as a dynamic brake by controlling current flow during unpowered closing, eliminating the need for separate friction brake components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The door drive motor is designed to perform multiple functions: it drives the door during normal operation and acts as a dynamic brake during power failure. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for dedicated friction brake components while reducing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the door drive is permanently wired as a generator to brake during power outage, then braking action is achieved, but device complexity and manufacturing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovenoiseVSAvoidease of manufacture
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The door drive's braking function is dynamically activated only when needed (during power failure). The control unit detects power loss and switches the motor to generator mode temporarily, allowing flexible adaptation without permanent structural modifications or special design requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit changes the electrical parameters of the door drive motor by altering current flow characteristics during power failure. This enables the motor to transition from motor mode to generator mode dynamically, achieving braking without permanent wiring changes or special design modifications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If no braking action is applied during power failure, then device complexity is reduced, but harmful noise and potential damage occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidnoise
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit continuously monitors the door's closing speed during power failure and adjusts the braking force accordingly. By measuring actual door movement and feedbacking to the control algorithm, the system achieves smooth controlled stopping without excessive braking force that would increase complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Object-affected harmful factors

If an electrical buffer with control electronics is added to enable dynamic braking, then noise is reduced and braking control is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovenoiseVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The electrical buffer and control electronics are integrated into the existing door drive control unit. By merging the backup power storage and control functions with the existing control architecture, the system achieves dynamic braking capability without adding separate complex subsystems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables a cost-effective and easy retrofit solution for elevator doors to achieve smooth closing during power failures without additional modifications, reducing noise and damage.

Implementation Method 1

electrical energy is buffered during normal operation of the door and, in response to a power failure, the energy is provided as substitute energy for a control unit of the door

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy buffering: Accumulator (energy)

Implementation Method 2

the door drive's control unit is designed so that, during a power outage, the door drive can essentially rotate freely, and is locked once the power supply is restored

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentEP4532390B1Method and device for controlling a closing movement of a door of an elevator car in the event of a power failure, door for an elevator car and elevator installation
Publication Date: 2026.04.01 INVENTIO AG
  • EP4532390B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method for controlling a closing movement of a door (104) of a lift car (100) during a power failure, wherein, during a control operation of the door (104), electrical power is buffered and, in response to the power failure, the power is provided as backup power (128) to a control device (110) of the door (104) in order to decelerate the closing movement.