Elevator Drive Motion Feedback Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In emergency situations, elevators face challenges in moving to a landing safely without consuming excessive energy, as existing methods either consume too much power or fail to move due to balance issues between the car and counterweight, leading to potential speed increases.

Innovation Solution

An elevator drive apparatus with a controller that detects the electrical operation amount of the drive unit, compares it to a threshold, and applies the brake when exceeded, using current or voltage as motion feedback to control the speed, ensuring safe and controlled movement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the brake is cycled/pulsed using a default frequency to limit elevator car speed, then the speed of the elevator car is controlled, but the energy consumption increases significantly and battery lifetime is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelevator car speedVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from current sensors to detect the actual movement of the elevator car. The controller monitors the current drawn by the motor during brake release and uses this feedback information to determine whether the car has moved sufficiently before reapplying the brake, replacing the fixed default frequency approach with an adaptive feedback-based control strategy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The brake cycling frequency is made dynamic rather than static. The system adjusts the brake release duration and reapplication timing based on real-time conditions such as the detected current magnitude and direction, which reflect the actual car movement status. This dynamic adaptation optimizes energy consumption while maintaining speed control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Speed

If the brake cycle time is prolonged to allow elevator car movement when car and counterweight are close to balance, then the car can move, but the speed of the elevator car may increase too much in case of high unbalance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelevator car speedVSAvoidsafe movement control
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors the current drawn by the motor during brake release. By analyzing the magnitude and direction of this current, the controller receives real-time feedback about the car's movement status and speed tendency, enabling it to adjust the brake reapplication timing to prevent excessive speed while ensuring movement when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of the brake control based on detected conditions. When the current indicates the car is moving slowly or not at all (suggesting near-balance conditions), the system prolongs the brake release duration. When current indicates rapid acceleration (suggesting high unbalance), the system shortens the release duration, thus adapting the parameter to maintain safe speed control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the brake is released to allow elevator car movement using imbalance between car and counterweight, then the car can advance to the nearest door zone, but excessive energy is consumed and battery lifetime is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemergency movement capabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses current sensors to provide feedback on the actual movement of the elevator car during emergency operation. The controller monitors this feedback to determine when the car has moved sufficiently toward the door zone, allowing it to reapply the brake at optimal moments and avoid unnecessary prolonged brake release that would waste energy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs periodic brake release and reapplication cycles during emergency operation, but the timing and duration of these periodic actions are optimized based on feedback. Rather than continuous brake release or fixed-frequency cycling, the system uses measured intervals adapted to the actual car movement, reducing energy consumption while maintaining the ability to reach the door zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution reliably limits the elevator's speed during emergencies, conserving energy and preventing excessive speed, allowing safe movement to a landing even when machinery is not observable.

Implementation Method 1

The electrical operation amount may be a current and/or a voltage generated by the rotating electrical machine due to a movement of the elevator car after releasing the brake device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS11584617B2Motion feedback in an elevator
Publication Date: 2023.02.21 KONE OYJ
  • US11584617B2 patent drawing
  • US11584617B2 patent drawing
  • US11584617B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An elevator drive apparatus is described which includes a drive unit for driving an elevator car, a brake device for braking a motion of the elevator car, a detector for detecting an electrical operation amount of the drive unit, and a controller. The controller is configured to release the brake device, to compare the detected electrical operation amount with a threshold, and to apply the brake device when the detected electrical operation amount exceeds the threshold. In this way, it is ensured that a speed of the elevator car in case of a rescue situation is within a safety limit.