Elevator Braking via Inverter Duty Cycle Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing battery-powered elevator systems rely on costly and complex braking resistors and relays to provide braking, which increases system complexity and cost.

Innovation Solution

A battery-powered elevator system that uses a controller and speed sensor to apply braking signals to switches in the inverter, adjusting the duty cycle of these signals based on the machine's speed to achieve braking without external resistors or relays, utilizing the motor's self-resistance for braking force.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a braking resistor and braking relay are used to provide braking, then braking function is achieved, but system cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking functionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the braking resistor and braking relay from the system by utilizing the inherent resistance of the motor windings for braking. The controller achieves braking by controlling the inverter switches to connect the motor to the DC bus, using the motor's own resistance to generate braking torque without requiring external braking components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The motor serves itself by using its own winding resistance for braking instead of requiring separate braking components. The motor's electrical characteristics are exploited to provide the braking function, making the system self-sufficient and eliminating the need for additional dedicated braking hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If a braking resistor and braking relay are used to provide braking, then braking function is achieved, but system cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking functionVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the braking resistor and braking relay components from the system architecture, thereby eliminating their associated costs. The braking function is achieved through software control of existing inverter switches, reducing bill of materials costs and simplifying manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The inverter switches serve dual functions: motor control during normal operation and braking during deceleration. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate braking components, reducing system cost while maintaining braking capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Speed

If duty cycle is adjusted based on speed signal, then smooth speed reduction is achieved, but control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed reduction smoothnessVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic control by continuously adjusting the duty cycle of the inverter switches based on real-time speed feedback from the speed sensor. The controller modifies the braking torque dynamically as the motor speed changes, ensuring smooth and controlled deceleration while adapting to varying load conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses speed feedback from the speed sensor to regulate the braking process. The controller compares the actual speed with the target speed and adjusts the duty cycle accordingly, creating a closed-loop control system that achieves smooth speed reduction through continuous feedback and adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution reduces motor peak currents, protects components, allows braking for any load without external components, minimizes brake wear, and ensures smooth speed reduction, thereby reducing costs and complexity.

Implementation Method 1

an inverter having a plurality of switches to convert DC power from the battery to AC power for the machine in a motoring mode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPower conversion (DC to AC):

Implementation Method 2

a speed sensor coupled to the machine, the speed sensor to generate a speed signal indicative of machine speed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpeed detection:

Implementation Method 3

a controller to apply braking signals to a group of the switches in a braking mode, the braking signals having a duty cycle in response to the speed signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic braking:

Data Source

PatentEP3033288B1Elevator braking in a battery powered elevator system
Publication Date: 2019.03.13 OTIS ELEVATOR CO
  • EP3033288B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3033288B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3033288B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An elevator system includes a battery; a machine having a motor to impart motion to an elevator car; an inverter having a plurality of switches to convert DC power from the battery to AC power for the machine in a motoring mode; a speed sensor coupled to the machine, the speed sensor to generate a speed signal indicative of machine speed; and a controller to apply braking signals to a group of the switches in a braking mode, the braking signals having a duty cycle in response to the speed signal.