Elevator Motor Torque Monitoring for Brake Dragging Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for monitoring brake dragging in elevators are inadequate, as they rely on expensive, unreliable, and difficult-to-install brake switches, which can fail to detect incomplete brake opening, leading to prolonged brake dragging and elevator service interruptions.

Innovation Solution

A method that calculates the motor torque estimate and compares it to the realized motor torque during elevator operation, generating a signal for possible brake dragging if the difference meets predetermined criteria, allowing for the detection of brake dragging without additional hardware and in conjunction with existing brake monitoring methods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If brake switches are used to monitor brake opening, then brake dragging can be detected, but the system becomes expensive, unreliable, and difficult to install

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake monitoring reliabilityVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The existing motor and torque calculation system perform dual functions: controlling elevator motion and monitoring brake dragging. The motor controller calculates motor torque estimate from motion profile and compares it with actual torque from current measurements, using this existing data to detect brake dragging without additional monitoring hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The motor controller is made multi-functional by enabling it to perform both elevator motion control and brake dragging monitoring. The same processor that controls the motor also analyzes torque differences to detect brake dragging, eliminating the need for separate monitoring devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If brake switches are installed to detect brake dragging, then monitoring capability is improved, but installation difficulty and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake opening detection precisionVSAvoidinstallation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The motor controller utilizes its existing computational resources and sensor data (current measurements) to perform brake monitoring functions, eliminating the need for external sensors or additional installation work.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical brake switch system is replaced with an electronic/software-based monitoring approach. The motor controller uses electrical current measurements and torque calculations to detect brake dragging, substituting mechanical sensing with electrical sensing and computational analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If brake switches are used for monitoring, then brake dragging detection is possible, but the system becomes expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake function reliabilityVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The motor controller performs brake monitoring as a free byproduct of its normal operation, using existing current measurements and torque calculations without requiring additional expensive hardware or increasing system cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using physical brake switches, the system creates a virtual monitoring capability within the motor controller software, using computational models to replicate the detection function that would otherwise require separate hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Productivity

If traditional brake monitoring methods are used, then brake dragging may be detected, but service interruptions occur due to undetected incomplete brake opening

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelevator availabilityVSAvoidbrake opening reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The motor controller continuously compares the calculated motor torque estimate with the actual motor torque during elevator operation. This real-time feedback mechanism detects discrepancies indicating incomplete brake opening, allowing immediate identification of brake dragging issues before they cause service interruptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The torque comparison monitoring operates continuously during elevator runs, providing constant surveillance of brake function rather than relying on intermittent switch signals. This continuous monitoring ensures brake dragging is detected regardless of when it occurs during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively identifies brake dragging issues during normal elevator operation, ensuring proper brake function and reducing service interruptions by determining if the brake opens correctly, without requiring new hardware installations.

Implementation Method 1

When current passes through the coil of the electromagnetic brake, then the attraction between the electromagnetic core and the armature moves the brake shoe away from the brake surface.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic attraction: Electromagnet

Data Source

PatentUS20210114841A1Method for monitoring brake dragging of an elevator
Publication Date: 2021.04.22 KONE OYJ
  • US20210114841A1 patent drawing
  • US20210114841A1 patent drawing
  • US20210114841A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes calculating a motor torque estimate for an electric motor of an elevator in an elevator run, determining a difference between the calculated motor torque estimate and a realized motor torque during the elevator run, and generating a signal indicating possible brake dragging based on the difference between the motor torque estimate and the realized motor torque.