Elevator Request Deduplication Logic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Elevator systems face inefficiencies during peak travel times due to individuals placing duplicate requests, which are interpreted independently, leading to unnecessary car assignments and resource misallocation.

Innovation Solution

The elevator system determines whether a second request from a user is the same as or different from a pending first request, prompting the user for confirmation or selection to ensure only one request is fulfilled, thereby avoiding duplicate assignments and optimizing car allocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the elevator system interprets each request independently without checking for duplicates, then the system is simple to operate and responds quickly to requests, but duplicate requests from the same user result in inefficient car assignments and resource misallocation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecar assignment efficiencyVSAvoidrequest handling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by checking for existing pending requests from the same user before assigning an elevator car. When a duplicate request is detected, the system proactively presents the original request details to the user and awaits confirmation, preventing inefficient duplicate assignments before they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If the system checks for duplicate requests and prompts users for confirmation, then duplicate assignments are reduced and resource allocation improves, but the user interaction process becomes more complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelevator service efficiencyVSAvoidrequest processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically detecting duplicate requests and presenting confirmation options to users. This automated approach reduces manual intervention needs and allows users to quickly confirm or modify their requests without extensive system assistance, balancing efficiency improvement with minimal time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If the system assigns elevator cars based on all received requests without filtering duplicates, then the system maintains high responsiveness to user inputs, but unnecessary car assignments occur leading to resource misallocation during peak travel times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverequest fulfillment accuracyVSAvoidcar assignment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by monitoring user requests and comparing them against existing pending requests. When a duplicate is detected, the system provides feedback to the user by displaying the original request details and seeking confirmation, ensuring accurate request fulfillment while preventing inefficient duplicate car assignments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12030741B2Processing multiple elevator service requests
Publication Date: 2024.07.09 OTIS ELEVATOR CO
  • US12030741B2 patent drawing
  • US12030741B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An illustrative example method of controlling an elevator system includes receiving a first request for elevator service from a requestor, receiving a second request for elevator service from the requestor while the first request is still pending, and controlling the elevator system to provide elevator service for only one of the first request or the second request.