Elevator Roller Guide With Multi-Axis Support Sheet

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Elevator system designers face challenges in reducing costs and fitting components within tighter space constraints, as traditional roller guides occupy more space and sliding guides are often more cost-effective but less efficient in high-speed applications.

Innovation Solution

The use of a roller guide assembly with a support sheet that integrates rollers on both sides of the elevator cab's sidewall, allowing for a three-roller configuration without the need for separate mounting, thereby reducing space requirements and installation complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional roller guides are used, then ride quality and energy efficiency are improved, but space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveride qualityVSAvoidspace requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The roller guide assembly integrates multiple rollers within a compact support sheet structure, nesting the guide function within the existing sidewall space. The first roller with axis parallel to the sheet and second/third rollers with axes perpendicular to the sheet are arranged to fit within the limited space between the sidewall and guiderail, achieving space-efficient guidance while maintaining roller benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention utilizes three-dimensional spatial arrangement by positioning rollers with different axis orientations (parallel and perpendicular to the support sheet) to engage with the guiderail from multiple dimensions. This allows the guide assembly to fit within tighter space constraints while maintaining effective guidance functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If traditional roller guides are used, then ride quality and energy efficiency are improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveride qualityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support sheet integrates multiple roller support functions into a single structural component. The sheet simultaneously supports the first roller (with parallel axis) and the second and third rollers (with perpendicular axes), merging what would traditionally require separate mounting structures into one integrated assembly, thereby reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The support sheet serves multiple functions: it provides structural support for all three rollers, acts as a mounting interface for the sidewall, and positions the rollers in precise three-dimensional relationships. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate components needed, simplifying the overall guide assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of manufacture

If sliding guide elements are used, then cost is reduced, but energy efficiency and ride quality worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecostVSAvoidfrictional losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces sliding contact with rolling contact by using three rollers instead of sliding elements. The first roller rotates on an axis parallel to the support sheet while the second and third rollers rotate on axes perpendicular to the sheet, substituting the high-friction sliding mechanism with low-friction rolling mechanisms to reduce energy losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enables space savings and cost reduction while maintaining the advantages of roller guides, such as reduced frictional losses and improved ride quality, by positioning rollers between the cab and guiderails, allowing for efficient vertical movement.

Implementation Method 1

Roller guides also reduce energy consumption because they have reduced frictional losses compared to sliding guide elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRolling friction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP2748094B1Elevator roller guide
Publication Date: 2019.08.07 OTIS ELEVATOR CO
  • EP2748094B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1C
  • EP2748094B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2748094B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

An exemplary vertically moveable elevator system component includes a top portion, a bottom portion and a plurality of vertically oriented side portions between the top and bottom portions. At least one of the side portions includes a roller guide support sheet. A first roller guide roller is supported by the sheet such that the first roller is at least partially disposed on a first side of the sheet and an axis of the first roller is generally parallel with the sheet. Second and third rollers are supported by the sheet such that the second and third rollers are on a second, oppositely facing side of the sheet. An axis of each of the second and third rollers is generally perpendicular to the axis of the first roller. The axis of each of the second and third roller remains in a fixed position relative to the sheet.