Elevator Safety Device Internal Inspection via Endoscope

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current inspection methods for service elevator traction and safety devices, particularly fall-arrest secondary safety devices, are cumbersome and costly, requiring frequent disassembly and full load drop tests, leading to increased downtime and ergonomic risks for maintenance personnel, with existing visual inspection methods like endoscopes not effectively addressing the need for internal component inspection without introducing new failure modes.

Innovation Solution

A non-contact visual inspection method using endoscopes to inspect the internal components of traction and safety devices, such as rollers and jaws, through the cable entry and exit holes, allowing for the evaluation of wear and damage without disassembly, using an 8.4 mm endoscope to assess the condition of the components without opening the safety device.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If disassembly and full load drop tests are performed for inspection, then inspection thoroughness is improved, but device downtime and maintenance cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection thoroughnessVSAvoiddevice downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection process is segmented into external inspection and internal inspection phases. The housing is divided into accessible external surfaces and internal components. External inspection can be performed quickly without disassembly, while internal inspection is performed selectively on components that require thorough examination, reducing overall downtime while maintaining inspection thoroughness for critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Visual inspection of external housing surfaces is performed as a preliminary action before deciding whether disassembly is necessary. This preliminary inspection can identify obvious defects that would require full disassembly, allowing inspectors to avoid unnecessary disassembly in cases where external inspection suffices, thereby reducing downtime while maintaining thoroughness where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If disassembly is performed for inspection, then internal component inspection is improved, but risk of introducing new failure modes increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinternal component inspectionVSAvoidrisk of introducing new failure modes
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The safety device is segmented into modular components (housing, internal mechanisms, cable components) that can be inspected separately. This allows inspectors to focus disassembly efforts on specific internal components that require thorough examination rather than complete disassembly, reducing the risk of introducing failure modes while maintaining inspection precision for critical internal parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Visual inspection methods create a detailed record (optical copy) of internal component conditions through photography and documentation during inspection. This copying approach allows thorough examination of internal components without requiring permanent disassembly, reducing the risk of introducing failure modes while maintaining inspection thoroughness through detailed visual recording.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If frequent inspection is performed, then safety monitoring is improved, but maintenance cost and operational disruption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety monitoringVSAvoidoperational disruption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Inspection frequency is structured as periodic action based on operational cycles, usage intensity, and risk assessment. Critical components are inspected at regular intervals, while less critical components are inspected less frequently. This periodic approach maintains safety monitoring effectiveness while reducing operational disruption compared to continuous or overly frequent inspection schedules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

Inspection effort is distributed as partial action across different components rather than exhaustive inspection of all components at every interval. High-risk components receive more frequent and thorough inspection, while lower-risk components receive less frequent or simplified inspection. This partial action approach maintains safety monitoring for critical areas while reducing overall operational disruption and maintenance costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP3178769B1Inspection of cable mounted elevator devices
Publication Date: 2020.01.15 ALIMAK GRP MANAGEMENT AB
  • EP3178769B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3178769B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2c
  • EP3178769B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

Methods for inspecting a cable mounted device (10) for an elevator are disclosed. The cable mounted device (10) comprises a housing (13), an entry hole (12) for a cable (5), and an exit hole (14) for the cable (5), and a cable actuation mechanism inside the housing (13). The method comprises inspecting the cable actuation mechanism using an endoscope. Cable mounted devices (10) having an additional inspection hole in the housing (13) for entry of an insertion tube of an endoscope and the use of an endoscope for the visual inspection of cable mounted devices (10) of an elevator are also disclosed.