Elevator Safety Arrangement for Shallow Shaft Maintenance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing elevator safety solutions for preventing unintended movement in shallow elevator shafts are often cumbersome, time-consuming, and prone to human error, particularly in scenarios where complex procedures are involved or space constraints are tight.

Innovation Solution

A safety arrangement with multiple pre-defined clearance levels and automatic, progressively strengthening safety operations using position sensors and actuation systems to stop the elevator car's upward movement when in inspection or maintenance mode, ensuring a reliable and safe working space without requiring manual intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual locking procedures are used to prevent unintended elevator movement, then safety is improved, but operation complexity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidoperation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The safety system automatically detects when maintenance mode is activated and initiates locking procedures without requiring manual intervention. The control unit monitors system state and autonomously engages safety mechanisms, eliminating the need for operators to manually lock the elevator car while maintaining high safety standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary safety checks and automatic locking actions before maintenance work begins. When maintenance mode is detected, the control unit proactively engages brakes and locking mechanisms in advance, ensuring safety is established before operators need to intervene.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If turnable buffers are installed in the bottom part of the shaft to ensure safety space, then safety is improved, but device complexity and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention removes the need for turnable buffers by extracting the safety function to the top of the shaft instead. Position sensors and automatic braking systems are installed at the upper part, eliminating complex mechanical buffer devices from the bottom shaft space and simplifying the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of placing safety mechanisms at the bottom of the shaft as in conventional systems, the invention inverts the approach by positioning sensors and braking systems at the top. This reversal eliminates the need for turnable buffers and complex bottom-shaft mechanisms while maintaining safety functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Reliability

If electrical supervision controls are used to monitor safety, then safety monitoring is improved, but system complexity and susceptibility to failure increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety monitoringVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces complex electrical supervision control systems with a simplified control unit that integrates sensing and actuation functions. Position sensors provide input signals that directly trigger braking mechanisms through the control unit, eliminating elaborate electrical monitoring circuits while maintaining effective safety oversight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If the elevator car is locked into position on the guide rail, then unintended movement is prevented, but ease of operation during maintenance decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement preventionVSAvoidmaintenance accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The safety system dynamically adjusts locking based on operational mode. During normal operation, standard braking applies. During maintenance mode, the control unit engages more definitive locking mechanisms that prevent movement while still allowing operators to manually reposition the car if needed, balancing safety with operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11505427B2Elevator with a safety arrangement and method for creating a safe working space in the upper part of the elevator shaft
Publication Date: 2022.11.22 KONE OYJ
  • US11505427B2 patent drawing
  • US11505427B2 patent drawing
  • US11505427B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to methods and arrangements for creating a safe working space in the upper part of an elevator shaft. A position of an elevator car in the elevator shaft in relation to a plurality of safety levels in the elevator shaft may be monitored, where each safety level is associated with a separate clearance of the elevator car from a ceiling of the elevator shaft. The elevator may be controlled to create a safety space zone at the upper part of the elevator shaft. The controlling may include progressively activating separate braking systems in response to the elevator car progressively moving upwards through separate triggering limits of separate clearances, to progressively strengthen an arresting of upwards movement of the elevator car through the elevator shaft.