Elevator Stop Control Using Robot Boarding Demand and Free Space

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Elevator operation systems that do not consider robot boarding plans may be inefficient and result in unnecessary stops due to a lack of integrated information about robot boarding demands.

Innovation Solution

An elevator control system utilizing image sensors and robots to determine available space in real-time, integrating data from robots and CCTV to optimize elevator stops based on passenger and robot occupancy, and communicate non-stop notifications when necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If elevator operation systems use traditional stopping methods without robot boarding information, then the system operates with simple control logic, but the elevator makes unnecessary stops and operates inefficiently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelevator operation efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by having robots provide boarding plan information to the elevator control apparatus before the elevator arrives. This allows the elevator to predict boarding demand in advance and make informed stopping decisions, eliminating unnecessary stops and improving operational efficiency without adding complex real-time decision-making requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously receiving robot boarding plan information and occupancy data, which the control apparatus uses to dynamically adjust elevator stopping decisions. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables the system to optimize efficiency while managing complexity through structured information flow

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the elevator stops at every platform to check for boarding demand, then the system ensures maximum passenger pickup, but the elevator makes unnecessary stops when space is already full

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveboarding efficiencyVSAvoidelevator travel time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of boarding demand by receiving robot boarding plans before the elevator arrives at each platform. This allows the elevator to skip platforms where either the elevator is full or no boarding is expected, thereby reducing unnecessary stops and travel time while maintaining boarding efficiency at relevant platforms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses real-time feedback from robot occupancy information and elevator capacity status to dynamically adjust stopping decisions. This feedback mechanism enables the elevator to optimize its route by skipping platforms where boarding is not possible or unnecessary, reducing travel time while maintaining high boarding efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If the elevator does not stop at platforms with potential boarding demand, then the elevator saves time and improves efficiency, but it may miss picking up passengers or robots that need boarding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelevator operation efficiencyVSAvoidboarding service reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system ensures reliability through comprehensive feedback from robot boarding plan information and real-time occupancy status. This feedback allows the elevator to accurately identify platforms where boarding is actually needed versus those where skipping is safe, maintaining high service reliability while improving operational efficiency through optimized stopping decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary verification of boarding demand through robot information before making skip decisions. This preliminary action ensures that the elevator only skips platforms where boarding is confirmed unnecessary, maintaining service reliability while achieving efficiency gains from reduced stopping at platforms where full service is not needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250368474A1Elevator Control Apparatus and Method
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20250368474A1 patent drawing
  • US20250368474A1 patent drawing
  • US20250368474A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An elevator control apparatus may include a free space detector configured to detect the free space within the elevator based on CCTV within an elevator and data receive by a robot, a boarding demand prediction unit configured to predict a boarding demand of the platform based on platform monitoring data, and an elevator controller configured to determine whether to stop at the platform based on the boarding demand and the free space, where the elevator controller may be configured to predict the number of passengers and the number of robots that can be boarded and provide them to the corresponding platform when it has determined to stop, and to provide a non-stop notification to the corresponding platform when it has determined not to stop.