Elevator Tab Failure Detection via Flight Data Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The operation of elevator tabs in aircraft control systems cannot be directly monitored or controlled by pilots, and there is no instrumentation to detect failures, posing a risk of undetected faults in critical flight conditions.

Innovation Solution

A method using flight data analysis to indirectly verify the operation of elevator tabs by analyzing movement and rotational positions relative to the elevators, employing an intentional delay to detect displacement and infer proper function without installing new sensors or instrumentation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If elevator tabs are made to function in balance mode to assist pilot control without hydraulic power, then manual controllability is improved, but the complexity of the control system increases due to the need for automatic reversal mechanism

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual controllabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The elevator tabs are pre-configured to automatically reverse to anti-balance function when specific flight conditions are detected (hydraulics engaged or flaps not retracted). This preliminary configuration eliminates the need for complex real-time control mechanisms during critical moments, as the tabs are already positioned to provide the necessary aerodynamic assistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The elevator tab system serves itself by automatically switching between balance and anti-balance functions based on flight conditions. The system monitors hydraulic status and flap position, then self-adjusts the tab function without requiring additional complex control mechanisms, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If instrumentation is installed to directly detect elevator tab failures, then detection capability is improved, but the cost and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure detection capabilityVSAvoidinstrumentation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses existing flight data parameters (elevator position, flap position, hydraulic status) as intermediaries to indirectly detect elevator tab failures. Instead of installing direct sensors on the tabs, the methodology analyzes the relationship between these existing parameters to infer tab functionality, eliminating the need for additional costly instrumentation while maintaining reliable failure detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces direct mechanical sensing instrumentation with a data analysis approach using existing flight data systems. By substituting physical sensors with computational analysis of elevator movement data, the system achieves failure detection capability without increasing device complexity or cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If the 737NG uses the same elevator size as the 737 Classic to maintain type rating compatibility, then ease of operation and pilot certification are improved, but aerodynamic authority is insufficient for the heavier and faster 737NG

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepilot certification continuityVSAvoidaerodynamic authority
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The elevator control system is segmented into two independent but coordinated components: the main elevator surface and the auxiliary elevator tabs. This segmentation allows the main elevator to maintain the original size for pilot certification continuity, while the tabs provide additional aerodynamic authority through coordinated movement, resolving the contradiction between size compatibility and force requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the function of the main elevator with the auxiliary elevator tabs to create a combined control system. The tabs are positioned to work in conjunction with the main elevator, effectively increasing the total aerodynamic authority without changing the size of the primary control surface, thereby maintaining pilot certification continuity while meeting the force requirements of the heavier 737NG.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS9824513B2Method of detecting elevator tab failure
Publication Date: 2017.11.21 UNITED AIR LINES INC
  • US9824513B2 patent drawing
  • US9824513B2 patent drawing
  • US9824513B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided for verifying proper operation of a left elevator tab disposed at an end portion of a left elevator of an aircraft and a right elevator tab disposed at an end portion of a right elevator of the aircraft. Because proper operation of the elevator tabs cannot be directly verified by existing aircraft instrument, the operation of the elevator tabs can be indirectly verified by analyzing flight data of the aircraft. After identification of a verification event, in which the elevator tabs move relative to the elevators, the positions of the left elevator and right elevator can be measured, and differences in the positions of the left elevator and right elevator can indicate proper operation of the left and right elevator tabs.