Elevator Group Control via Threshold Load Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Optimizing route determination for an elevator group to minimize energy consumption while considering other parameters, as a route with the lowest energy consumption may not be the most effective when accounting for occupancy rates and load values.

Innovation Solution

An elevator control apparatus and method that determines threshold loads for each elevator based on counterweight balance, allocating elevators to minimize load differences from these thresholds to optimize route determination and prevent energy inefficient allocations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If route determination minimizes total energy consumption, then energy efficiency is improved, but other parameters such as occupancy rate and load value may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidoccupancy rate and load value balance
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces threshold load parameters for each elevator (first threshold for up direction, second threshold for down direction) that are determined based on counterweight balance. These parameters serve as decision criteria for route determination, changing the optimization from pure energy minimization to a parameter-based allocation that balances multiple factors including occupancy rate and load value while maintaining energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If elevators are allocated based on predicted occupancy rate and load value, then occupancy balance is improved, but energy consumption optimization may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoccupancy rate and load valueVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent determines threshold loads based on counterweight balance parameters and uses these thresholds as the primary decision criterion for route determination. This parameter-based approach ensures that elevators are allocated in a way that maintains counterweight balance optimization, thereby minimizing energy consumption while still considering occupancy and load value through the threshold comparison mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If route determination considers multiple parameters simultaneously, then overall system performance is improved, but route determination complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem performanceVSAvoidroute determination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent simplifies the multi-parameter optimization problem by transforming it into a threshold-based decision process. Instead of simultaneously optimizing multiple parameters, the system determines threshold loads in advance based on counterweight balance, then uses simple threshold comparisons for real-time route determination. This reduces computational complexity while maintaining system performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3188996B1Elevator control apparatus and method for controlling an elevator group based on different counterweight ratios
Publication Date: 2020.01.15 KONE OYJ
  • EP3188996B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3188996B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3

AI summary

According to one aspect, there is provided a method for controlling an elevator group comprising at least a first elevator (202) and a second elevator (210), wherein a counterweight balance of the first elevator (202) differs from a counterweight balance of the second elevator (210), the method comprising: controlling the elevator group comprising at least the first elevator (202) and the second elevator (210); determining threshold loads for the first (202) and second elevator (210) separately for up and down direction, a threshold load being dependent of the counterweight balance of the corresponding elevator, wherein the threshold load being a load for which consumed energy per up-down run is approximately zero; and controlling, when allocating an elevator in response to a destination call, route determination for the first (202) and second elevator (210) comprises minimizing a load difference from the threshold loads.