Ellipsometer Beam Characterization via Spatial Ray Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In ellipsometer systems, the increasing complexity due to decreasing sample size and the need for higher accuracy in measurement data leads to non-trivial multi-beam-ray effects, causing variations in sample characterization results, which require more detailed calibration and analysis to account for different optical paths and effects like reflection, refraction, and polarization changes.

Innovation Solution

The method involves subdividing the measurement beam into spatially distributed beam rays, providing parameterized mathematical models for each ray, and performing a data regression calibration to account for multi-beam-ray effects, allowing for accurate determination of sample parameters that minimize deviations from true values.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a single beam model is used for sample characterization, then the system is simpler to operate, but measurement precision deteriorates due to unaccounted multi-beam-ray effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operation simplicityVSAvoidsample characterization accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the measurement beam into multiple spatially distributed beam rays, each treated as an independent source. This segmentation allows the system to account for different optical paths and multi-beam-ray effects while maintaining a manageable computational framework through parameterized mathematical models for each ray.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If beam size is decreased to improve sample characterization, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity increases due to significant multi-beam-ray effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample characterization accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the parameters of the mathematical models to account for multi-beam-ray effects. By using parameterized models that incorporate reflection, refraction, coordinate system changes, AOI, POI, and polarization state changes for each beam ray, the system accurately characterizes samples while managing complexity through systematic parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If detailed calibration procedures are implemented to account for multi-beam-ray effects, then measurement precision improves, but loss of time increases due to complex data analysis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter determination accuracyVSAvoidcalibration and analysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention performs preliminary actions by establishing parameterized mathematical models for each beam ray before actual measurements. The systematic calibration procedure using known samples pre-determines the relationship between beam parameters and sample characteristics, reducing the time required for analysis during actual measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves the accuracy of sample characterization by treating each beam ray as an independent source, reducing errors from multi-beam-ray effects and providing more precise sample parameter values compared to single-ray systems.

Implementation Method 1

Various parts of a sample investigating beam can produce different results because of different reflection, refraction, coordinate System changes, (AOI), (POI) and general polarization state changes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

Various parts of a sample investigating beam can produce different results because of different reflection, refraction, coordinate System changes, (AOI), (POI) and general polarization state changes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRefraction: Refraction

Implementation Method 3

causing the resulting polarized electromagnetic beam to interact with a calibration sample... and then enter a polarization state detector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPolarization: Polarisation

Data Source

PatentUS9952141B1Method of characterizing a beam of electromagnetic radiation in ellipsometer and the like systems
Publication Date: 2018.04.24 J A WOOLLAM CO
  • US9952141B1 patent drawing
  • US9952141B1 patent drawing
  • US9952141B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An approach to characterizing beams of electromagnetic radiation such as are applied in ellipsometer and the like systems, involving considering the beam to be comprised of a number of spatially distributed beam rays, each of which is represented mathematically as an effectively independent source.