Elongated Support Bar with Cylindrical Surface for Bone Regeneration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current support devices for biological membranes in bone regeneration, such as titanium mesh and long bone screw methods, face issues like difficulty in removal, tissue adherence, uneven surfaces, and instability, leading to potential bone loss and infection.

Innovation Solution

A support device featuring an elongated support bar with cylindrical surfaces and a clamping plate, allowing flexible shaping and secure fixation of the biological membrane, preventing tissue adherence and ensuring stability during bone regeneration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If titanium mesh is used to support the regeneration membrane, then the membrane can be supported, but soft tissue grows into the through holes and adheres to the mesh, making it difficult to remove

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport stabilityVSAvoidremoval difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The support device is divided into two functional parts: a mesh portion for supporting the regeneration membrane and a smooth support bar portion for easy removal. The mesh portion remains in place to provide structural support, while the smooth support bar can be easily extracted after healing, as tissue does not adhere to its smooth surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the support device have different surface properties: the mesh portion has a porous structure that allows tissue integration and stability, while the support bar portion has a smooth surface that prevents tissue adherence and facilitates easy removal. This local differentiation of surface quality resolves the contradiction between stability and removability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If titanium mesh with through holes is used, then the membrane can be supported, but the uneven surface and sharp edges may pierce the gum, leading to bone loss and infection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport stabilityVSAvoidtissue damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The device separates the supportive mesh function from the smooth support function. The mesh portion provides stability while the smooth support bar portion eliminates sharp edges that could pierce tissue, as the smooth surface is designed specifically to be tissue-friendly during the healing period.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support bar portion has a specifically engineered smooth surface quality that contrasts with the mesh portion. This smooth surface prevents tissue adherence and eliminates sharp edges, locally addressing the tissue damage risk while maintaining overall support stability through the mesh structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Area of stationary object

If multiple support devices are used for large defect areas, then adequate support is provided, but the operation becomes more complicated and inconvenient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support device is designed as a universal component that can be applied to various defect sizes and locations. The mesh portion adapts to the defect area while the smooth support bar provides consistent support functionality, allowing the same device design to handle different coverage areas without increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The mesh portion and smooth support bar portion are combined into a single integrated device. This merging allows the device to function both as a support structure and as an easy-to-remove component, reducing the need for multiple separate devices and simplifying the overall procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If long bone screws are used to support the membrane, then the membrane can be supported, but the limited fastening length in atrophied bone makes the screws unstable and prone to shaking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemembrane supportVSAvoidscrew stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The device separates the support function (mesh portion) from the anchoring function (smooth support bar). The mesh portion provides the primary support for the membrane, reducing the burden on the anchored portion and allowing for greater overall stability even with limited fastening length in atrophied bone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11771559B2Support device and method of using the same
Publication Date: 2023.10.03 WANG SHENG PENG
  • US11771559B2 patent drawing
  • US11771559B2 patent drawing
  • US11771559B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A support device for supporting a biological membrane includes a support bar that is elongated, that extends along a length direction and that has at least one cylindrical surface extending along the length direction for supporting the biological membrane. A method of using the support device, which is suitable for mounting on a space of a bone defect structure of a human body and which is suitable for supporting a biological membrane, is also disclosed.