EM Propagation Logging for Direct Formation Conductivity Estimation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electromagnetic logging methods rely on computationally intensive inversion techniques that obscure the underlying physics of formation resistivity measurements and are limited by model assumptions, making it difficult to interpret and compute formation resistivity accurately.

Innovation Solution

Direct estimation of apparent conductivity using electromagnetic propagation measurements without inversion or resistivity transforms, utilizing a derived tool constant and simple analytical expressions to compute apparent conductivity and resistivity, suitable for deep EM measurements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If inversion techniques are used to compute formation resistivity, then measurement precision is improved, but computational complexity and processing time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveformation resistivity measurement precisionVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the computationally intensive inversion processing step from the measurement system. Instead of using inversion techniques, the invention directly computes formation resistivity from electromagnetic propagation measurements using simplified analytical relationships, thereby eliminating the complex computational burden while maintaining measurement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent inverts the traditional approach by not using inversion techniques to compute resistivity. Instead of inverting the electromagnetic field equations to solve for formation properties, the method uses direct analytical expressions that compute resistivity from measured propagation characteristics, effectively reversing the computational paradigm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Measurement precision

If inversion techniques are used to compute formation resistivity, then measurement precision is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveformation resistivity measurement precisionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the time-consuming inversion processing step from the measurement workflow. By using direct analytical computations instead of iterative inversion algorithms, the system achieves rapid resistivity calculation while maintaining measurement accuracy, significantly reducing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent skips the lengthy inversion processing stage entirely. The method rushes through the computation by using direct analytical expressions that provide immediate resistivity values from electromagnetic measurements, eliminating the iterative refinement process that characterizes traditional inversion techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Measurement precision

If inversion techniques are used to compute formation resistivity, then measurement precision is improved, but the underlying physics becomes obscured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveformation resistivity measurement precisionVSAvoidloss of physical interpretability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the inversion processing layer that obscures physical interpretation. By using direct analytical methods, the invention maintains a clear connection between the electromagnetic propagation measurements and the computed resistivity values, preserving the physical meaning of the data throughout the computation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces computational requirements and provides accurate, direct computation of formation conductivity, enabling efficient and interpretable resistivity logging without the need for complex inversion techniques.

Implementation Method 1

electromagnetic propagation measurements made using an electromagnetic propagation tool having at least one transmitting antenna spaced apart from at least one receiving antenna

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic propagation: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS20260009924A1Direct determination of formation apparent conductivity from em propagation measurements
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US20260009924A1 patent drawing
  • US20260009924A1 patent drawing
  • US20260009924A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for estimating an apparent conductivity of a subterranean formation includes acquiring at least first and second electromagnetic propagation measurements made using an electromagnetic propagation tool having at least one transmitting antenna spaced apart from at least one receiving antenna. A ratio is computed using the measurements and further evaluated to estimate the apparent conductivity.