Thin Metallic EM Support Foil to Prevent Specimen Buckling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electron microscopy specimen supports suffer from specimen movement during imaging due to stress buildup and buckling, leading to degraded image quality and limited throughput in high-resolution structure determination.

Innovation Solution

A metallic foil support with holes having a thickness of less than 50 nm and a hole-to-thickness ratio of 15:1 or less, made from transition metals or degenerately doped silicon, to minimize stress and prevent buckling, ensuring structural stability and uniformity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional carbon or metal foil supports are used, then structural support is provided, but specimen movement and buckling occur due to stress buildup

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespecimen stabilityVSAvoidstress buildup and buckling
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the foil support by reducing thickness to less than 50 nm and controlling the hole-to-thickness ratio to 15:1 or less. This parameter optimization minimizes stress buildup in the ice layer while maintaining sufficient structural support, preventing buckling and specimen movement during imaging

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite material structures combining metallic foils with specific hole patterns and ice layers. The metallic foil provides mechanical support while the optimized hole geometry and thin ice layer reduce stress accumulation, creating a composite system that eliminates buckling without sacrificing specimen stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Stability of the object's composition

If thicker foils are used to prevent buckling, then structural stability improves, but image resolution degrades due to increased scattering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoil structural stabilityVSAvoidimage resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the foil thickness parameter to a specific range (less than 50 nm) that balances two competing requirements: thin enough to minimize electron scattering and maintain high image resolution, yet thick enough to provide adequate structural support when combined with the optimized hole-to-thickness ratio of 15:1 or less

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If smaller hole diameters are used to increase throughput, then imaging capacity improves, but support strength decreases leading to buckling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging throughputVSAvoidfoil support strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters by reducing hole diameter while simultaneously optimizing the hole-to-thickness ratio to 15:1 or less. This allows smaller holes (increasing throughput) without compromising support strength, as the reduced thickness compensates for the smaller hole size maintaining adequate structural integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent addresses the strength-throughput trade-off by introducing a new dimensional parameter: the hole-to-thickness ratio. By controlling this ratio rather than just hole diameter, the system can accommodate smaller holes for higher throughput while maintaining support strength through optimized thickness, effectively adding a degree of freedom to the design space

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Strength

If larger hole diameters are used to maintain support strength, then buckling is prevented, but throughput is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoil support strengthVSAvoidimaging throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes both hole diameter and thickness parameters simultaneously, controlling their ratio to 15:1 or less. This allows the system to use smaller hole diameters (increasing throughput) while compensating with reduced thickness to maintain adequate support strength, reversing the conventional approach of using larger holes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12469670B2Electron microscopy support
Publication Date: 2025.11.11 UNITED KINGDOM RESEARCH AND INNOVATION
  • US12469670B2 patent drawing
  • US12469670B2 patent drawing
  • US12469670B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A support for an electron microscopy sample, the support comprising a metallic foil having one or more holes therethrough wherein thickness of the metallic foil is less than 50 nm and/or the mean linear intercept grain size is 50 nm or less, wherein the ratio of the diameter of each hole to the thickness of the metallic foil is 15:1 or less, and wherein the metallic foil consists of either (a) one or more metals selected from transition metals, aluminium and beryllium, or an alloy thereof; or (b) degenerately doped silicon wherein the dopant element is selected from boron, aluminium, boron and arsenic at a concentration of 1020 atoms/cm3 or higher.