Email Anomaly Detection via Behavioral Velocity Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current email systems lack effective mechanisms to detect and react to unauthorized access, which can lead to breaches and subsequent malicious activities, as existing solutions primarily focus on prevention rather than reaction and are limited in scope to analyzing email content without considering broader behavioral patterns or remote data.

Innovation Solution

A computerized system that analyzes temporal patterns, volume, frequency, and acceleration of messages using an analysis server to intercept and evaluate email activity before delivery, comparing it to baseline behavior patterns and disparate data to identify anomalies indicative of unauthorized access, and takes proactive measures such as generating warnings or quarantining messages.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If email systems focus on prevention mechanisms only, then security coverage is limited to known threats, but the system cannot detect or react to unauthorized access after it occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity detection capabilityVSAvoidreactive security response
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by establishing baseline behavioral patterns of legitimate email activity before unauthorized access occurs. These baselines include temporal patterns, volume metrics, and velocity characteristics that are learned during normal operation. When anomalies are detected, the system can react in real-time, thus combining prevention (through preliminary baseline establishment) with reactive detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where email sending behavior is constantly monitored, compared against established baselines, and used to update detection models. The feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from both legitimate and malicious patterns, improving its ability to detect unauthorized access while maintaining adaptability to new threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If the system analyzes comprehensive behavioral patterns including temporal, volume, and velocity metrics, then detection accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection accuracyVSAvoidanalysis system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex analysis task into distinct modular components: temporal pattern analysis, volume metric analysis, velocity characteristic analysis, and baseline comparison. Each component handles a specific aspect of behavioral analysis independently, making the overall system more manageable and maintainable while achieving high detection accuracy through the combination of these specialized modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a universal analysis framework that handles multiple types of email behaviors (temporal patterns, volume metrics, velocity characteristics) using a common baseline comparison mechanism. This multi-functional approach allows the same core infrastructure to detect various types of unauthorized access patterns without requiring separate specialized systems for each metric.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If the system intercepts and analyzes all outgoing messages in real-time, then unauthorized access detection improves, but message delivery speed may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunauthorized access detectionVSAvoidmessage delivery speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by analyzing only the most critical behavioral metrics (temporal patterns, volume, velocity) rather than performing exhaustive content analysis on every message. This selective approach maintains real-time detection capability while minimizing the impact on message delivery speed, as the system focuses on metadata characteristics that can be evaluated quickly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements skipping by allowing messages that conform to established baseline patterns to pass through the analysis pipeline quickly without extensive scrutiny. Only messages that deviate from expected behavior trigger deeper analysis, enabling the system to maintain high throughput for legitimate traffic while still detecting anomalies that require closer examination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Data Source

PatentUS20240056462A1Computerized system for temporal, volume, and velocity analysis of an electronic communication system
Publication Date: 2024.02.15 VIRTUAL CONNECT TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US20240056462A1 patent drawing
  • US20240056462A1 patent drawing
  • US20240056462A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computerized system for temporal, volume, and velocity analysis of electronic communication systems comprising: a set of computer readable instructions in communications with a message system adapted for determining a user pattern, a user environment, user location, or user schedule, determining is an electronic message is sent contrary to the user information and taking action on the electronic message taken from the group consisting of deletion, quarantine, notification, warning, re-routing, and any combination.