Email Visibility Control for BCC Recipient Privacy and Reply

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing email systems restrict BCC recipients from replying to all recipients, including TO and CC recipients, which limits two-way communication and can reveal hidden recipient identities in forwarded emails, failing to provide effective user-defined visibility settings for maintaining privacy.

Innovation Solution

Implementing user-defined visibility settings through 'green' and 'red' lists within email clients, allowing BCC recipients on the 'green' list to reply to all while maintaining privacy by designating specific recipients for visibility and restricting visibility for those on the 'red' list, enabling two-way communication within predefined groups.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If BCC recipients are hidden from other recipients to protect privacy, then recipient privacy is improved, but BCC recipients cannot reply to all recipients including TO and CC recipients

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecipient privacyVSAvoidreply capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments recipients into different visibility groups (privileged vs. non-privileged) and implements different reply behaviors for each group. BCC recipients are segmented into those who can reply all (privileged) and those who cannot (non-privileged), allowing selective restoration of reply capability while maintaining privacy for others.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different visibility and reply permissions are assigned to different recipients based on their classification. Privileged BCC recipients receive special local quality treatment allowing them to reply all, while non-privileged BCC recipients maintain standard hidden recipient restrictions, enabling localized privacy control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If BCC recipients are hidden from other recipients, then recipient identity security is improved, but hidden recipient identities may be revealed in forwarded emails

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentity securityVSAvoididentity revelation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary mechanism (privileged list classification) between the BCC recipient and the forwarding process. Privileged BCC recipients are marked with special indicators that allow them to control their own visibility in forwards, preventing automatic identity revelation while maintaining security for non-privileged recipients.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The visibility of BCC recipients is made dynamic rather than static. Privileged BCC recipients can dynamically choose whether to include themselves in forwarded emails based on their privileged status, allowing flexible control over identity revelation context-by-context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If all recipients are treated equally in email distribution, then system simplicity is improved, but user-defined visibility settings cannot be implemented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidvisibility control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the recipient list into privileged and non-privileged groups, allowing differential treatment. This segmentation enables user-defined visibility settings by classifying recipients based on their email addresses or other criteria, providing adaptability while maintaining manageable complexity through clear categorization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the visibility parameter for specific recipients based on their classification. By modifying the visibility parameter selectively for privileged BCC recipients versus non-privileged recipients, the system achieves user-defined control without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8171089B2Privileged and restricted email processing to multiple recipients based on sender defined visibility settings
Publication Date: 2012.05.01 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US8171089B2 patent drawing
  • US8171089B2 patent drawing
  • US8171089B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided for email processing to recipients based on user defined visibility settings. Input of email addresses for recipients in a privileged list and for recipients not in the privileged list is received. An email message is transmitted to recipients in the privileged list and to recipients not in the privileged list. The recipients in the privileged list are able to visibly distinguish recipients in the privileged list from the recipients not in the privileged list. The recipients not in the privileged list are unable to visibly distinguish the recipients in the privileged list. Input of email addresses for recipients in a restricted list and for recipients not in the restricted list is received. An email message is transmitted to recipients in the restricted list and to recipients not in the restricted list. Recipients in the restricted list are unable to visibly see recipients in the restricted list.