Frequency Optimization System for Email Campaigns

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing online marketing technologies struggle to determine an optimal electronic communications frequency that balances campaign goals with acceptable opt-out rates, as conventional methods are inflexible and require substantial human input.

Innovation Solution

A multi-objective electronic communications frequency optimization system that sets campaign goals, such as open rates and opt-out percentages, and uses data models to automatically optimize contact frequencies for individual recipients and groups, thereby achieving campaign objectives while managing opt-outs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If electronic communications are sent frequently to increase brand awareness or convert customers, then campaign goals are improved, but opt-out rates increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecampaign goals achievementVSAvoidopt-out rates
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the frequency parameter of electronic communications based on customer responses and campaign performance. By changing the sending frequency parameter adaptively rather than using a fixed schedule, the system maximizes campaign goals while keeping opt-out rates below the specified threshold.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where customer responses (opens, clicks, opt-outs) are continuously monitored and fed back into the optimization model. This feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from actual customer behavior and adjust communication frequencies accordingly, resolving the contradiction between achieving campaign goals and maintaining acceptable opt-out rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If conventional frequency optimization methods are used, then implementation is simple, but substantial human input is required and flexibility is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidhuman intervention requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs multi-objective optimization automatically without requiring continuous human intervention. The optimization engine autonomously determines communication frequencies by processing campaign goals, customer data, and response feedback, thereby reducing manual workload while maintaining implementation simplicity through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual frequency determination processes with an automated computational optimization model. Instead of marketers manually adjusting frequencies based on experience and trial-and-error, the system uses mathematical optimization algorithms to automatically calculate optimal frequencies, substituting mechanical human processes with automated computational processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of manufacture

If fixed communication schedules are used, then campaign management is straightforward, but adaptability to individual customer preferences is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecampaign management easeVSAvoidindividual customer preference adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different communication frequencies to different customer segments or individual customers based on their specific preferences, historical behavior, and response patterns. Instead of a uniform fixed schedule, each customer receives a customized frequency that adapts to their local characteristics, thereby improving adaptability while maintaining manageable complexity through segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static fixed schedules to dynamic frequency adjustment. Communication frequencies are continuously adapted based on real-time customer responses and changing campaign conditions, allowing the system to remain flexible and responsive while maintaining straightforward management through automated processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250166019A1Multi-objective electronic communication frequency optimization
Publication Date: 2025.05.22 ADOBE INC
  • US20250166019A1 patent drawing
  • US20250166019A1 patent drawing
  • US20250166019A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are provided for improved electronic communication campaign technologies, which can automatically balance objectives or goals of an electronic communication campaign against an overall opt-out rate for the electronic communication campaign. An electronic communications frequency optimizer can generate individual contact frequencies for individual email recipients. Embodiments can avoid unnecessary or counterproductive communications while achieving overall campaign goals, and can use processes to improve the efficiency of systems. In some cases, embodiments cluster communication recipients into different groups based on their past actions, then optimizes the communication contact frequency on different groups, to avoid performing optimization directly on millions of recipients. Some embodiments automatically self-update, for example with recipients' recent responses, to generate and/or implement campaign communication schedules on an individual level.