Email Locale Mismatch Detection and Display Warning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Global email communication often results in misinterpretation due to cultural and linguistic differences between senders and recipients, leading to misunderstandings caused by varying date formats, number representations, currency symbols, and word meanings across different locales.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that detect interpretation risks by extracting and comparing locale data from email headers, scanning the email content for potential misinterpretations, and modifying the display to indicate possible misinterpretations, using techniques such as highlighting or warnings, when a locale mismatch is detected.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If email communication is used for global business exchange, then communication efficiency and accessibility are improved, but misinterpretation risks due to cultural and linguistic differences increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication efficiencyVSAvoidinterpretation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary locale comparison and content scanning before the recipient reads the email. By extracting locale data from email headers and comparing sender/recipient locales in advance, the system identifies potential misinterpretation risks before they occur, allowing proactive warnings to be displayed rather than reactive corrections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The email client acts as an intermediary between the sender and recipient by inserting itself into the communication flow. It extracts locale information, compares cultures, scans content for risky elements, and displays warnings as an intermediate layer that mediates the potential misinterpretation before the recipient fully processes the email content

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If locale data extraction and content scanning are performed for all emails, then interpretation risk detection accuracy is improved, but system processing time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different processing levels to different emails based on locale mismatch detection. Not all emails undergo full content scanning - only those with detected locale mismatches between sender and recipient. This selective approach maintains high detection accuracy for at-risk emails while reducing unnecessary processing for safe communications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The risk detection process is segmented into distinct stages: first extracting locale data from email headers, then comparing sender/recipient locales, and only if a mismatch is detected, proceeding to scan email content. This segmentation allows the system to avoid full content scanning for all emails, reducing overall processing complexity while maintaining detection accuracy for problematic cases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11620442B2Interpretation risk detection
Publication Date: 2023.04.04 CITRIX SYSTEMS INC
  • US11620442B2 patent drawing
  • US11620442B2 patent drawing
  • US11620442B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for detecting global interpretation risks in an email. A method includes extracting data from a header of an email, the data indicative of a locale of a sender; comparing the extracted data to other data indicative of a locale of a recipient of the email; and in response to a mismatch between the locales of the sender and recipient: scanning content of the email to identify portions of content subject to misinterpretation by the recipient, and modifying display of the email in response to an identification of at least one portion of content subject to misinterpretation, the modifying to indicate possible misinterpretation of the content by the recipient.