Email Response Prediction via Recipient Cognitive Profile

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing email systems lack the ability to accurately predict response times from recipients based on their cognitive states, workloads, and attentiveness, leading to inefficient communication and potential delays.

Innovation Solution

A method that uses a processor to generate a likelihood of response time based on a recipient's profile, including their degree of attentiveness, workload, and work habits, which is then presented to the sender, allowing for a refined out-of-office message and improved expectation management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing email systems send automatic out of office messages, then users can indicate unavailability during certain time periods, but the system cannot accurately predict actual response times based on recipient's cognitive state and workload

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse time prediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameters used for response time prediction from simple calendar-based availability to a multi-dimensional model incorporating recipient's cognitive state, workload level, efficiency metrics, and work habits. This allows accurate prediction of actual response times by dynamically adjusting predictions based on current recipient state rather than relying on predetermined time periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary processing layer that analyzes recipient profiles and cognitive states to generate predicted response times. This intermediary component processes multiple data sources (attentiveness, workload, efficiency, work habits) and translates them into actionable response time predictions, bridging the gap between raw data and useful information without requiring direct complex interactions between all system components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the system monitors recipient's attentiveness, workload, efficiency, and work habits, then it can generate accurate response likelihood predictions, but this increases the complexity of data collection and processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse prediction reliabilityVSAvoiddata collection and processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The recipient profile serves as a universal data structure that consolidates multiple attributes (attentiveness, workload, efficiency, work habits) into a single integrated model. This multi-functional profile can be used for various prediction purposes and can be updated incrementally as new data becomes available, reducing the need for separate complex processing systems for each data type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where actual response times are compared with predicted response times, and this information is used to refine and update the recipient profile. This continuous feedback loop improves prediction reliability over time while automating the data collection and processing, reducing the manual complexity of monitoring multiple recipient attributes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If senders wait for actual responses from recipients, then communication accuracy is maintained, but communication efficiency decreases due to delays and uncertainty

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication efficiencyVSAvoidwaiting time for response
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by predicting response times before actual responses occur. Senders receive predicted response times that allow them to plan subsequent actions, set appropriate follow-up schedules, and manage their own time effectively. This preliminary information enables senders to take proactive rather than reactive actions, improving communication efficiency without sacrificing accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10127525B2Enhanced e-mail return receipts based on cognitive consideration
Publication Date: 2018.11.13 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10127525B2 patent drawing
  • US10127525B2 patent drawing
  • US10127525B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment of the invention provides a method for enhanced e-mail return receipts based on cognitive considerations. An input device receives an expected response time from a sender of an electronic message, wherein the expected response time includes the amount of time that the sender expects to receive a response to the electronic message. A processor generates a likelihood that the recipient of the electronic message will respond to the electronic message within the expected response time based on a profile of the recipient. The profile of the recipient includes the recipient's degree of attentiveness to the electronic message, the recipient's workload, the recipient's efficiency, and the recipient's work habits. A communications device presents the likelihood that the recipient will respond to the electronic message within the expected response time to the sender.