Email Response Time Estimation Using Recipient History

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current email communication lacks effective means to estimate response times, leading to inefficiencies in waiting for responses due to unknown recipient availability and schedules, often resulting in futile waiting or delayed responses.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for estimating email response times based on a set of recipients, utilizing modules for recipient identification, response time determination, trend analysis, and dynamic updates, which provides minimum, average, and maximum response time estimates, and suggests additional recipients to reduce overall response time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If traditional email communication is used without response time estimation, then users can send emails freely, but users experience wasted time waiting for responses and cannot gauge recipient responsiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse time estimationVSAvoidemail system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by analyzing historical email response data and providing estimated response times to senders. The feedback mechanism processes past communication patterns between specific sender-recipient pairs and delivers predictive information about future response times, enabling senders to make informed decisions about follow-up timing without adding significant system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs self-service by automatically collecting and analyzing response time data from email metadata without requiring manual input from users. The algorithm autonomously processes send/receive timestamps, calculates response intervals, and generates predictions independently, eliminating the need for user intervention while reducing time loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If users send multiple follow-up messages to check for responses, then they can ensure their message was received, but this creates inefficiency and may be counterproductive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemessage delivery confirmationVSAvoidcommunication efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by calculating estimated response times before the sender actually sends the follow-up message. By providing advance prediction of when a response is expected, the system enables senders to time their follow-ups optimally, avoiding premature or redundant messages while ensuring reliable delivery confirmation through data-driven timing decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If users wait for responses without knowing recipient availability, then they can avoid disturbing recipients, but they may experience futile waiting or delayed responses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecipient availability awarenessVSAvoidwaiting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides feedback about recipient responsiveness patterns by analyzing historical data on when recipients typically respond to emails. This feedback includes estimated response times specific to each recipient, allowing senders to understand recipient availability patterns and plan their communication strategy accordingly, reducing futile waiting while maintaining polite timing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamics by continuously updating response time estimates based on new email interactions and changing recipient behavior patterns. The algorithm adapts to seasonal variations, workload changes, and individual recipient preferences, providing dynamically adjusted predictions that reflect current availability patterns rather than static assumptions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Loss of information

If email status indicators show user availability, then users can see if recipients are at their computers, but this does not guarantee responsiveness and can be overridden

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecipient responsiveness informationVSAvoidavailability accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from actual email response behavior to determine true responsiveness, rather than relying on self-reported status indicators. By analyzing the gap between email send time and actual response time, the system infers genuine availability and engagement levels, providing more precise measurement of recipient responsiveness that cannot be faked or overridden like status indicators

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8312089B2Apparatus, system, and method for email response time estimation based on a set of recipients
Publication Date: 2012.11.13 SNAP INC
  • US8312089B2 patent drawing
  • US8312089B2 patent drawing
  • US8312089B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus, system, and method are disclosed to dynamically estimate a response time while composing an email. A recipient module determines a set of email recipients identified by a user. The set of email recipients comprises intended recipients of a new email message from the user. A response time identification module determines a response time trend for each email recipient. Each response time trend has information relating to previous email response times of an email recipient. An estimate module determines an estimated response time for the new email message based on the retrieved response time trends. A display module displays a visual representation of the response time to the user.