Email Subject Suggestions via Classifier Feature Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users often face difficulties in determining suitable content subjects for sharing, leading to reduced sharing of content as they spend substantial time developing subjects, and may forego sharing content altogether.

Innovation Solution

The development of classifiers trained on email body text and subjects to auto-generate content subject suggestions by identifying and weighing features such as dates, word count, proper nouns, and specific actions within the content, improving precision based on user preferences and historical email data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If users manually determine content subjects for sharing, then the precision and relevance of subjects can be improved, but the time required and complexity of the task increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubject relevanceVSAvoidtime to develop subject
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of the content body during the composition process, identifying key features and generating subject suggestions before the user needs to finalize the email. This advance preparation reduces the time users spend on subject development while maintaining relevance through pre-computed feature analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by automatically analyzing the email body content, extracting relevant features, and generating subject suggestions without requiring manual user intervention. The classifiers autonomously process the content and provide subject recommendations, allowing users to simply review and select rather than create subjects from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If users spend substantial time developing content subjects, then the quality of subjects can be improved, but the productivity of content sharing decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubject qualityVSAvoidcontent sharing rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the manual mechanical process of subject creation with an automated computational system. Classifiers trained on feature analysis substitute for human cognitive effort in subject development, rapidly generating quality suggestions based on content features without the time investment required for manual subject crafting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of subject generation by using trained classifiers that evaluate multiple content features (dates, word count, proper nouns, actions) simultaneously. This multi-parameter approach generates high-quality subjects through automated feature weighting and probability assessment, maintaining subject quality while dramatically reducing the time parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual subject development is required, then user control over subject selection is maintained, but the ease of operation and user convenience decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser controlVSAvoidease of subject creation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides dynamic subject suggestions that adapt as the user composes the email body. As users add or modify content, the classifiers continuously analyze the updated features and regenerate relevant subject suggestions, maintaining user control while reducing the effort required to develop subjects throughout the composition process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system acts as an intermediary between the user's content and the final subject selection. The trained classifiers serve as a mediator that processes the email body, generates multiple subject suggestions, and presents them to the user for selection, thereby easing the operational burden while preserving user autonomy in the final subject choice.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If simple subject generation methods are used, then the ease of operation is improved, but the precision and relevance of subjects deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of subject generationVSAvoidsubject relevance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the subject generation process into distinct feature analysis components (dates, word count, proper nouns, actions) that are evaluated independently by specialized classifiers. This segmentation allows comprehensive analysis of multiple content aspects while maintaining ease of operation through automated processing of each feature category.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system combines multiple classifier outputs and feature analyses into a composite subject suggestion. By integrating results from various feature evaluations (dates, proper nouns, actions, word count) through a unified classification framework, the system generates high-precision subjects that reflect the composite nature of the email content while requiring minimal user effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS10929469B2Content subject suggestions
Publication Date: 2021.02.23 YAHOO ASSETS LLC
  • US10929469B2 patent drawing
  • US10929469B2 patent drawing
  • US10929469B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more computing devices, systems, and/or methods for auto-generating subject suggestions are provided. For example, a set of n-grams are generated from text within an email body of an email being composed by a user and/or from descriptive information of attachments to the email. Features of the set of n-grams are identified, such as a date feature, a proper noun feature, an activity feature, a number of words feature, etc. Classifiers are used to assign probabilities to the n-grams based upon the features. A probability may specify a strength of an n-gram in relation to a user preference of the user for an email subject derived from the n-gram. In this way, an email subject suggestion is generated based upon a target n-gram with a probability exceeding a threshold. The email subject suggestion is provided to the user, such as during email composition or during sending of the email.