Email Subscription Recommendation System for Inbox Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face challenges in controlling unwanted email subscriptions and lack recommendations for subscribing or unsubscribing from electronic communications, leading to irrelevant messages and missed relevant updates.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that determines a user's state based on their actions to provide personalized recommendations for subscribing or unsubscribing from electronic communications, using a processor to collect user actions, categorize messages, and offer timely recommendations for unsubscribing from unwanted lists or subscribing to relevant ones.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If users manually manage email subscriptions, then they have control over their inbox, but they spend excessive time and effort filtering irrelevant messages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser control over inboxVSAvoidtime spent managing subscriptions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically analyzing user actions and generating subscribe/unsubscribe recommendations without requiring manual intervention. The system monitors user email interactions, determines user state (discovery or cleaning), and autonomously provides personalized subscription recommendations, allowing users to maintain inbox control with minimal effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring user actions on email messages and using this information to generate dynamic recommendations. The system tracks user interactions, determines changes in user state, and adjusts subscription recommendations accordingly, creating a closed-loop system that learns from user behavior and improves over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of information

If users receive more email updates, then they get more relevant content, but they also receive more irrelevant messages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelevant content deliveryVSAvoidirrelevant message traffic
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by providing personalized subscription recommendations tailored to each user's specific interests and current state. Instead of generic recommendations, the system analyzes individual user behavior patterns and generates customized suggestions, ensuring that each user receives relevant content while filtering out irrelevant messages based on their unique preferences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system utilizes parameter changes by detecting transitions in user state between discovery and cleaning modes. When users are in discovery state, the system recommends subscriptions to deliver relevant content; when in cleaning state, it recommends unsubscribing to reduce irrelevant traffic. This dynamic adjustment of recommendation parameters based on user state changes optimizes the balance between content delivery and spam reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the system provides automated recommendations, then user effort is reduced, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubscription management effortVSAvoidrecommendation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies segmentation by dividing the recommendation process into distinct functional modules: action monitoring, state determination, and recommendation generation. This modular architecture breaks down the complex task of automated recommendation into manageable components, each handling a specific aspect of the process, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining automated functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses an intermediary approach by introducing a state determination layer between user actions and recommendation generation. This intermediate state machine simplifies the complexity by abstracting user behavior into discrete states (discovery/cleaning), which then drive recommendation logic. This intermediary layer acts as a buffer that translates complex user interactions into simple, actionable recommendation states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11361038B2Method and system for providing subscribe and unsubscribe recommendations
Publication Date: 2022.06.14 YAHOO ASSETS LLC
  • US11361038B2 patent drawing
  • US11361038B2 patent drawing
  • US11361038B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present teaching relates to providing a recommendation for subscribing to or unsubscribing from an electronic communication. In one example, actions of a user are obtained with respect to electronic communications of the user. One or more categories of the electronic communications are determined. A state of the user is determined based on the actions and the one or more categories. The state is either a discovery state indicating that the user expresses an interest to receive electronic communications associated with a specific category or a cleaning state indicating that the user lacks an interest in one or more received electronic communications. A subscribe recommendation for subscribing to electronic communications associated with the specific category is provided when the state is determined to be a discovery state. An unsubscribe recommendation for unsubscribing from electronic communications similar to the one or more received electronic communications is provided when the state is determined to be a cleaning state.