Email Tags with Routing Descriptions for Rule Misrouting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Email routing and organization become problematic when customized user-defined rules and filters overlap, leading to frustration as users may inadvertently route legitimate messages to junk folders, causing confusion and mismanagement of email messages.

Innovation Solution

Implementing email tags that provide a routing description to help users understand why an email was routed to a particular folder, allowing them to modify the underlying rules and filters to ensure messages are delivered to the intended destination, thereby reducing the overhead of sorting emails.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If customized user-defined rules and filters are implemented to route emails, then email organization and routing functionality is improved, but system complexity and difficulty of operation increase due to overlapping rules causing misrouting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemail routing functionalityVSAvoiduser operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism by displaying routing descriptions that explain why an email was routed to a particular folder. This feedback loop allows users to understand the routing decisions made by complex rules, enabling them to adjust their filters and rules with confidence. The routing description serves as explanatory feedback that simplifies the operation of complex routing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The routing description acts as an intermediary between the complex email routing system and the user. Instead of requiring users to directly manage and debug complex overlapping rules, the routing description provides a simplified explanation layer that mediates between the system's automated routing decisions and user needs, making the system easier to operate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If multiple email filters and rules are applied to sort emails, then email sorting capability is improved, but time required for users to understand and manage routing decisions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemail sorting efficiencyVSAvoiduser time for managing routing
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The routing description provides preliminary explanation information before the user needs to manage routing decisions. By pre-displaying why an email was routed to a particular folder, the system prepares explanatory context in advance, reducing the time users would otherwise spend investigating routing issues when they arise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides immediate feedback through routing descriptions that explain routing decisions. This feedback mechanism eliminates the need for users to spend time manually analyzing and debugging complex filter rules, as the routing description instantly provides the necessary information to understand and correct misrouting with minimal time investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Speed

If automated email routing rules are implemented, then email delivery speed is improved, but reliability decreases when rules overlap and cause legitimate messages to be routed to junk folders

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemail delivery speedVSAvoidemail routing accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The routing description provides feedback that enables users to quickly identify and correct routing errors. When a legitimate email is mistakenly routed to the junk folder due to overlapping rules, the routing description explains the automated decision-making process, allowing users to rapidly adjust their rules and restore correct delivery, thereby maintaining high reliability despite automated routing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The routing description serves as a cushioning mechanism that prepares users for potential routing errors. By explaining the routing logic in advance, the system allows users to preemptively adjust their filters or rules before misrouting occurs, or quickly correct errors when they arise, maintaining reliable email delivery despite the complexity of automated routing rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentEP2572329B1Email tags
Publication Date: 2020.07.29 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • EP2572329B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2572329B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2572329B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Email tags are described. In embodiments, email messages are received for distribution to client devices that correspond to respective recipients of the email messages. Email routing decisions are applied to route an email message to an email folder for a recipient of the email message, where the email folder may include an email inbox, a junk folder, or a user-created folder. The email message is then tagged with an email tag to generate a tagged email message. The email tag includes a routing description that indicates why the email message was routed to the particular email folder.