Email Trust Analysis for Phishing Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Phishing attacks through e-mails pose a significant threat to enterprises as existing security measures, such as firewalls and user training, are often ineffective due to the asymmetrical nature of the threat and the ease with which attackers can send large volumes of malicious emails, with personal e-mails often bypassing enterprise security systems.

Innovation Solution

A robust phishing prevention system that combines an organization's social graph with machine learning algorithms to analyze e-mail metadata, providing a non-intrusive interface that flags suspicious emails within the familiar e-mail interface, locking them to prevent interaction until the user reviews and approves them, and uses actionable insights to educate users about potential threats.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If firewalls are used to capture suspicious e-mails before they reach the target, then security protection is improved, but false positives occur where trusted e-mails are blocked and phishing e-mails are allowed through

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity protectionVSAvoidtrusted e-mails blocked
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system analyzes communication patterns and trust relationships between users, continuously learning from observed interactions to dynamically adjust security decisions. This feedback mechanism allows the system to distinguish between legitimate and malicious emails based on established trust metrics rather than static rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary trust analysis layer between the firewall and the user. This intermediary evaluates the relationship between sender and recipient, acting as a mediator that allows trusted communications to pass through while blocking phishing attempts, thereby reducing false positives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If users are trained to recognize and delete phishing e-mails, then user awareness is improved, but the asymmetrical nature of the threat means only one untrained user is needed for successful attacks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser awarenessVSAvoidsecurity effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automated trust analysis and phishing detection without requiring user intervention or training. The security mechanism serves itself by automatically evaluating email trustworthiness based on communication patterns, eliminating the need for users to manually recognize or delete phishing emails.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical approach of user training and manual email deletion with an automated computational system that uses machine learning and trust relationship analysis to detect and block phishing emails, thereby improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If personal e-mail services are accessed on enterprise devices through web browsers, then user convenience is improved, but security systems become blind to phishing attacks from personal e-mail accounts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser convenienceVSAvoidsecurity detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies universal trust relationship analysis across all email types, including both enterprise and personal email accounts. The security mechanism functions uniformly regardless of email source, analyzing communication patterns and trust metrics to detect phishing attempts from any account type through the browser interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Measurement precision

If machine learning algorithms analyze e-mail metadata to detect phishing, then detection accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system focuses on analyzing only the most critical metadata elements and trust relationship indicators rather than examining every possible email attribute. This partial analysis approach achieves high detection accuracy while avoiding the complexity of comprehensive metadata inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11546375B2Detection of external messaging attacks using trust relationships
Publication Date: 2023.01.03 PREKARI INC
  • US11546375B2 patent drawing
  • US11546375B2 patent drawing
  • US11546375B2 patent drawing

AI summary

External messaging attacks are detected using trust relationships. A profile is built for each target within an organization using extracted header data from multiple prior messages. Trust scores are derived for each sender of a message for each target profile, each trust score is derived from a degree and a quantity of communication between the respective sender and the target in the extracted header data. Incoming messages are received and a target and a sender of each incoming message is determined. A trust score is retrieved for the sender from the profile of the target for each incoming message, labels are generated for each of incoming message based on the respective trust score, and the respective label is applied to be visible to the target in association with the message for each respective message.