Email Validation System Predicting Misdirection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current email validation systems are inefficient and inaccurate, requiring manual configuration and lacking the ability to validate diverse email content, leading to potential misdirection, especially when users switch between different email platforms.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing a processor, email dissector, analyzer, and validator, coupled with AI and neural networks to analyze email attributes, predict misdirection, and automatically adjust email account configurations to prevent misdirection, while being platform-agnostic and capable of validating email content.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple separate email validation tools are used for different email platforms, then each platform can be validated, but the device complexity and user burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with different email platformsVSAvoidnumber of validation tools required
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal email validation system that can validate emails across multiple platforms (Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo, etc.) through a single tool. The system uses platform-agnostic validation techniques including DNS record analysis, SMTP protocol testing, and email format verification that work independently of specific email providers, thereby achieving multi-platform compatibility without requiring separate tools for each platform

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple validation functions into a single integrated system. Instead of requiring separate tools for different platforms, the system merges platform-specific validation routines with universal validation methods, allowing users to validate emails from any platform through one unified interface, thus reducing the number of tools needed while maintaining comprehensive validation capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of manufacture

If manual configuration is used for email validation, then the system is easier to implement, but validation accuracy decreases due to limited user knowledge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of system implementationVSAvoidemail validation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automatic configuration capabilities where the validation system autonomously learns and adapts to user preferences and email patterns without requiring manual setup. The system automatically analyzes validation results, adjusts validation parameters, and configures platform-specific settings based on observed usage patterns, thereby eliminating the need for manual configuration while maintaining high validation accuracy through self-optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where validation results are continuously analyzed and used to improve future validations. The system learns from validation outcomes, user corrections, and misdirection patterns to automatically refine validation rules and configurations, ensuring high accuracy without requiring manual intervention. The feedback loop enables the system to adapt to emerging email formats and validation challenges autonomously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If validation is limited to basic email attributes, then the system is faster and simpler, but misdirection cannot be detected when attachments or content are wrong

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation speedVSAvoiddetection of email misdirection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary validation of email attachments and content metadata before the actual email sending occurs. The system analyzes attachment types, checks content previews, and validates recipient eligibility in advance, allowing users to correct potential misdirection issues before emails are sent. This preliminary action prevents misdirection without significantly impacting overall validation speed, as the analysis is performed asynchronously or in parallel with user composition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a multi-level validation approach where basic attribute validation (recipient address, email format) is performed quickly for all emails, while more intensive content and attachment analysis is performed selectively based on risk assessment. The system applies excessive validation only when necessary - such as when suspicious patterns are detected or for high-risk recipients - thereby maintaining fast validation for routine emails while ensuring thorough checking when needed, balancing speed and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11165735B1Email validation
Publication Date: 2021.11.02 ACCENTURE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LTD
  • US11165735B1 patent drawing
  • US11165735B1 patent drawing
  • US11165735B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for email validation are disclosed. The email validation includes transforming format of emails to a predefined format understandable the present system and application of text mining component on the transformed format. The email validation further includes obtaining details from a repository related to a historical pattern associated with an email validation requirement and a cognitive learning operation employed for the historical email validation to ascertain an outcome of the historical validation for similar emails. The email validation also includes predicting misdirection of the email and change in configuration of the email account based on the validation of the email.