Embedded Inerter Metamaterials for Low-Frequency Vibration Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vibration mitigation materials struggle to effectively reduce low-frequency vibrations in compact forms, as they either become fragile or excessively heavy due to the need for large sizes and high masses to achieve resonance frequencies in the 1 to 100 Hz range, making them impractical for smaller structures and applications.

Innovation Solution

The development of inerter-based metamaterials that incorporate a structural matrix with embedded inerter arrays, including microinerters, which provide a frequency-independent inertial force, allowing for compact vibration attenuation while maintaining a small unit cell size relative to the operating wavelength, thereby reducing vibrations in ultra-low frequency ranges.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing vibration mitigation materials use large mass resonators to achieve low-frequency vibration reduction, then vibration attenuation effectiveness is improved, but the device weight and size become excessively large making them impractical for smaller structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration attenuation effectivenessVSAvoidresonator mass
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter from using large mass resonators to using inerters with frequency-independent inertial force. This parameter change allows achieving the same vibration attenuation effectiveness at low frequencies without requiring large masses, thus resolving the contradiction between effectiveness and weight

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical resonance system (mass-spring) with an inerter-based system that provides frequency-independent inertial force. This substitution eliminates the need for large mass resonators while maintaining vibration attenuation effectiveness, directly addressing the weight-effectiveness contradiction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Speed

If existing vibration mitigation materials decrease resonator stiffness to achieve low-frequency operation, then resonance frequency is reduced to target range, but the material becomes too fragile for practical applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresonance frequencyVSAvoidmaterial fragility
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter controlling resonance frequency from stiffness-dependent (traditional mass-spring systems) to inertance-dependent (inerter-based systems). Since inertial force is frequency-independent, the system can achieve low-frequency operation without reducing stiffness, thus maintaining structural strength while targeting the desired frequency range

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If conventional vibration mitigation materials use large unit sizes to mitigate low-frequency vibrations, then vibration attenuation performance is improved, but the device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase for smaller structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration attenuation performanceVSAvoidunit size relative to structure size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the scaling parameter from wavelength-proportional unit sizes to fixed-small unit sizes enabled by inerters. Since inertial force is frequency-independent, the unit cell size does not need to scale with wavelength, allowing small unit sizes to be used effectively for low-frequency vibration mitigation in compact structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the vibration mitigation function into distributed inerter units embedded within the structural matrix material. This segmentation allows each small unit to contribute to overall vibration attenuation, achieving effective performance without requiring large individual unit sizes, thus reducing device complexity for smaller structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Inerter-based metamaterials achieve significant vibration reduction in ultra-low frequency ranges with unit cell sizes several orders of magnitude smaller than the operating wavelength, offering improved band-gap formation and robustness against damage, making them suitable for a wide range of engineering applications.

Implementation Method 1

The inerter array can include a first inerter cell oriented along a first attenuation axis and a second inerter cell oriented along a second attenuation axis different from the first attenuation axis. The first inerter cell can include a first inerter and the second inerter cell can include a second inerter.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertia: Inertia

Data Source

PatentUS20240401667A1Inerter-Based Elastic Metamaterials For Low-Frequency Vibration Mitigation
Publication Date: 2024.12.05 UNIV OF UTAH RES FOUND
  • US20240401667A1 patent drawing
  • US20240401667A1 patent drawing
  • US20240401667A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An inerter-based metamaterial for low-frequency vibration attenuation includes a structural matrix material and an inerter array. The inerter array can be embedded within the structural matrix material. The inerter array can include a first inerter cell oriented along a first attenuation axis and a second inerter cell oriented along a second attenuation axis different from the first attenuation axis. The first inerter cell can include a first inerter. The second inerter cell can include a second inerter. The first inerter and the second inerter can be microinerters. The first inerter cell and the second inerter cell can be separated from each other by at least a portion of the matrix material. The first inerter cell and the second inerter cell can each include a first end and a second end and can each be connected to the matrix material at both the first end and the second end.