Embedded IPS for Industrial Controllers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial control systems lack effective intrusion prevention mechanisms at the edge controllers, making them vulnerable to cyberattacks that can disrupt critical infrastructure.

Innovation Solution

An embedded intrusion prevention system (IPS) is integrated into industrial controllers, such as PLCs, which analyzes packet payloads and predicts potential harm to physical systems. It uses models of the physical system and control logic to simulate the effects of incoming commands, preventing harmful actions from being executed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If intrusion detection systems are located only in main computers, then the main computer can provide centralized security monitoring, but edge controllers remain vulnerable to cyberattacks without local protection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity protectionVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The intrusion prevention functionality is segmented from the main computer and embedded directly into individual edge controllers. Each edge controller becomes a self-protecting unit with its own IPS, eliminating the single-point vulnerability of centralized security and providing distributed defense across the industrial control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The intrusion prevention system is nested within the edge controller architecture, with the IPS embedded as an internal component of the controller itself. This nested structure allows the edge controller to contain its own security mechanism, creating a layered defense where the IPS is protected by the controller's hardware while simultaneously protecting the controller from cyberattacks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If edge controllers include embedded intrusion prevention systems, then local security protection is provided, but the device complexity and resource requirements of edge controllers increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecybersecurity defenseVSAvoidcontroller functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The IPS performs preliminary analysis of incoming packets and commands before they are executed by the edge controller. By predicting potential harmful effects in advance using process models and simulation, the system prevents malicious actions before they can compromise the physical system, rather than reacting after an attack succeeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The IPS uses virtual copies and models of the physical process and control logic to simulate and predict the effects of incoming commands. Instead of directly testing commands on the actual physical system, the IPS creates virtual representations to evaluate potential harm, reducing the risk to the real system while maintaining accurate security assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If the intrusion prevention system analyzes all incoming packets deeply, then detection accuracy improves, but processing time and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattack detection accuracyVSAvoidpacket processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The IPS performs preliminary prediction of packet effects using pre-loaded process models before full analysis. By quickly simulating the potential impact of incoming commands using simplified models, the system can identify obviously malicious packets early and apply more rigorous analysis only when needed, reducing overall processing time while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The IPS applies different levels of analysis to different packets based on their characteristics. For routine or clearly benign packets, the system performs minimal validation, while for suspicious or high-risk packets, full deep analysis is applied. This selective approach ensures thorough detection of attacks while avoiding unnecessary processing overhead for safe communications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12238120B1Embedded intrusion prevention system for industrial controllers
Publication Date: 2025.02.25 UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA
  • US12238120B1 patent drawing
  • US12238120B1 patent drawing
  • US12238120B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An intrusion prevention system can be embedded in an industrial controller to detect possible attacks on the corresponding physical system of the industrial controller. The intrusion prevention system can analyze the payload of network packets received at the industrial controller and predict what harm the payload of the network packet could cause to the physical system if executed by the industrial controller. To predict how the payload of a network packet may affect the physical system, the intrusion prevention system can perform a simulation with the payload of the network packet. The simulation can incorporate a model of the physical system, a copy of the logic used by the industrial controller and information relating to the current state of the system. The result of the simulation can be new predicted states for the physical system that can be evaluated to determine if a safety violation has occurred.