Embedded Magnetic Inductor Substrates With Lower Signal Interference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In microelectronic packaging, inductor structures face efficiency issues due to magnetic material interference with signal integrity, affecting power delivery requirements as the magnetic material can hinder input/output density, z-height reduction, and form factor minimization.

Innovation Solution

The selective embedding of magnetic materials within specific locations of microelectronic package substrates using techniques like stencil printing, grinding, and plasma etching to form embedded inductor structures, allowing for precise placement and minimizing surface coverage, thus avoiding interference with signal integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If magnetic material is used in inductor structures, then power delivery requirements are met, but signal integrity is interfered with due to conductive fillers in the magnetic material

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower delivery efficiencyVSAvoidsignal integrity interference
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the harmful conductive fillers from the magnetic material while retaining the beneficial magnetic properties. This is achieved by selecting magnetic materials that are inherently free of conductive fillers, thereby eliminating the source of signal interference while maintaining power delivery functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different material qualities to different regions: the magnetic material is used where magnetic properties are needed for power delivery, while conductive fillers are excluded from regions where signal integrity is critical. This spatial differentiation of material properties resolves the contradiction between power delivery and signal integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Power

If inductor structures are added to meet power delivery requirements, then power delivery efficiency improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower delivery efficiencyVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the inductor structure with the existing substrate by embedding the magnetic material directly into the substrate layers. This integration eliminates the need for separate external inductor components, thereby improving power delivery efficiency while avoiding increased device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The substrate is designed to serve multiple functions: it provides mechanical support, electrical interconnection, and hosts the magnetic inductor structure for power delivery. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional dedicated components, thus improving power delivery without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If magnetic material is embedded in substrate, then external inductors are eliminated, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent countVSAvoidembedding precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by forming cavities and preparing substrate layers before embedding the magnetic material. This advance preparation ensures that the magnetic material can be precisely positioned and embedded without requiring excessive precision during the final embedding step, thereby reducing overall manufacturing precision requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies manufacturing parameters such as cavity dimensions, magnetic material thickness, and embedding depth to optimize the embedding process. By carefully controlling these parameters, the patent achieves precise embedding while maintaining reasonable manufacturing precision requirements that can be met with standard fabrication capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances power delivery efficiency by integrating magnetic inductors within the substrate, reducing the need for external inductors and minimizing signal interference, while allowing for increased input/output density and reduced form factor.

Implementation Method 1

magnetic material of such inductor structures can interfere with signal integrity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic material properties: Ferromagnetism

Implementation Method 2

conductive fillers present in the magnetic material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentUS11862552B2Methods of embedding magnetic structures in substrates
Publication Date: 2024.01.02 INTEL CORP
  • US11862552B2 patent drawing
  • US11862552B2 patent drawing
  • US11862552B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods/structures of forming embedded inductor structures are described. Embodiments include forming a first interconnect structure on a dielectric material of a substrate, selectively forming a magnetic material on a surface of the first interconnect structure, forming an opening in the magnetic material, and forming a second interconnect structure in the opening. Build up layers are then formed on the magnetic material.