Embedded Pilot Training via Learning Management System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current recurrent flight crew training methods, including computer-based training and simulators, fail to effectively evaluate pilots' understanding of aircraft systems and decision-making capabilities, especially in unusual situations, and require significant time and resources for recurrent training, leading to high costs for airlines.

Innovation Solution

An embedded training system that utilizes a learning management system to identify downtime in pilots' schedules and offer personalized, mid-fidelity simulation training modules linked to their specific flight routes and scenarios, leveraging roster and flight data, and incorporating AI analysis to recommend relevant training exercises, which can be completed during available time on flights or before/after flights.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional recurrent training programs (CBT, simulators) are used, then training coverage is achieved, but training time and costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining effectivenessVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The training program is segmented into modular exercises that can be completed independently during brief downtime periods. Instead of requiring continuous blocks of time for comprehensive training, the system divides training content into discrete, manageable units that pilots can complete during layovers, between flights, or during scheduled downtime, thereby maintaining training effectiveness while significantly reducing the total time required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system identifies and presents training exercises in advance during periods of downtime before they are needed. By proactively offering training modules during layovers or scheduled downtime rather than waiting for formal training sessions, the system ensures training is completed beforehand, eliminating the need to take pilots off flying duties for dedicated training periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive simulator training is provided, then skill evaluation is improved, but training costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompetency evaluation accuracyVSAvoidtraining system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of requiring expensive full-motion simulators for all training and evaluation, the system uses simplified digital replicas and virtual reality environments that replicate essential flight scenarios. These virtual training environments provide sufficient measurement precision for competency evaluation while dramatically reducing the complexity and cost associated with physical simulator infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If pilots are taken off flying duties for training, then training quality is improved, but operational productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining qualityVSAvoidflight operational capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The training system operates continuously alongside flight operations rather than interrupting them. Pilots maintain their flying duties while simultaneously completing training modules during available downtime periods. This approach ensures training quality is maintained through consistent, ongoing learning while flight operational capacity remains uninterrupted and at full productivity levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Ease of operation

If generic training programs are used, then training delivery is simplified, but training relevance to specific flights decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining delivery simplicityVSAvoidtraining scenario relevance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The training system provides locally optimized content tailored to each pilot's specific flight route, aircraft type, and operational context. Rather than delivering generic training programs, the system selects and customizes training exercises that are specifically relevant to the pilot's upcoming flights, thereby maintaining ease of automated delivery while significantly improving training scenario relevance and applicability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11580872B2Embedded training for commercial aviation
Publication Date: 2023.02.14 THE BOEING CO
  • US11580872B2 patent drawing
  • US11580872B2 patent drawing
  • US11580872B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A learning management system may be configured to retrieve roster data from a roster database and determine from the roster data whether a pilot has a scheduled downtime during a flight or a layover time before the flight. The system may further retrieve flight data associated with the flight from the learning management system and determine a training concept associated with the flight. The system may also select a training exercise from multiple training exercises, where the training exercise is associated with the training concept. A notification may be sent to an electronic device associated with the pilot, where the notification includes an offer to perform the training exercise.