Embedded Seizure Detection During Brain Stimulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current seizure detection methods for epilepsy, particularly for drug-resistant epilepsy, are inaccurate due to the reliance on patient diaries and the limited exploration of intracranial EEG signals for seizure detection in brain stimulation devices, leading to challenges in evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic brain stimulation.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for detecting seizures using intracranial EEG signals, segmenting them into time-frequency domains, and applying a classifier to determine seizure activity based on power thresholds, with adjustable parameters for different stimulation conditions, to create an electronic seizure log.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If patient diaries are used to track seizure outcomes, then seizure monitoring is implemented, but accuracy and reliability of seizure data are poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseizure detection accuracyVSAvoiddata reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical system of patient diaries with an automated electronic seizure detection system that uses implantable devices to sense brain electrical activity and automatically log seizure events, eliminating human error and improving measurement precision and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The implantable device performs self-monitoring of seizure activity by automatically detecting and logging events without requiring patient intervention or manual diary keeping, enabling continuous objective monitoring

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If intracranial EEG signals are used for seizure detection during brain stimulation, then seizure detection capability is improved, but false positive rate increases due to stimulation artifacts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseizure detection accuracyVSAvoidfalse positives
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of brain signals to distinguish seizure activity from stimulation artifacts before final seizure detection, using trained classifiers to predict whether detected events are true seizures or stimulation-related false positives

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from signal classification results to adjust detection thresholds and parameters, continuously optimizing the balance between seizure detection sensitivity and false positive reduction based on observed signal patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If fixed detection parameters are used across different stimulation conditions, then device complexity is reduced, but detection accuracy decreases when stimulation is present

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseizure detection accuracyVSAvoidparameter adjustment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts detection parameters based on the presence and characteristics of brain stimulation, automatically modifying detection thresholds and signal processing settings to optimize performance under varying stimulation conditions without requiring manual reconfiguration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Improves seizure detection accuracy with reduced false positives, providing a reliable electronic record of seizure history and enabling adjustments to brain stimulation therapy based on precise seizure data.

Implementation Method 1

The iEEG signals can be segmented into fixed time intervals, each segment converted from the time domain to the frequency domain (e.g., using a fast-Fourier transform (FFT))

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFast-Fourier transform:

Data Source

PatentUS20260054073A1Embedded seizure detection during therapeutic brain stimulation
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 MAYO FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION & RESEARCH
  • US20260054073A1 patent drawing
  • US20260054073A1 patent drawing
  • US20260054073A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This specification describes techniques for seizure detection in mammals. A first set of electrodes is used to stimulate a region of a brain of a mammal, and an electrical signal sensed by a second subset of electrodes is acquired during stimulation. The electrical signal is segmented into time-segmented portions according to a value of a time parameter. For each time-segmented portion of the electrical signal, a power is determined for the portion of the signal within a frequency band defined by a value of a frequency parameter. A classifier is used to classify the time-segmented portion of the signal as seizure positive or seizure negative based on the determined power within the frequency band. The values of the time and frequency parameters can result in the classifier achieving an effective level of performance defined by an area under a precision-recall curve (AU-PRC) for the classifier of at least 0.5.