Embedding Space for Content Comprehension

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current content understanding systems lack the ability to differentiate question difficulty and relationships between questions, relying on neural networks to memorize answers without addressing question similarity or topic relevance.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a hierarchical knowledge taxonomy with question-answer pair adaptation, where a common embedding space is trained to embed related question and content vector representations closer together, allowing for the determination of relationships between questions of varying complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If neural networks are used to memorize answers to questions, then the system can answer specific trained questions, but the system cannot answer similar questions or questions on similar topics where it was not specifically trained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to answer questionsVSAvoidtraining requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates simplified question representations (question graphs) that copy the essential semantic structure of questions without requiring full neural network training. By extracting and representing key question elements in a standardized format, the system can handle similar questions through structural matching rather than memorization, reducing training complexity while maintaining answerability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms questions into different parameter representations - converting natural language questions into structured question graphs with defined parameters and relationships. This parameter transformation allows the system to process and match questions based on their structural parameters rather than requiring identical training examples, thereby improving adaptability without proportional increases in training complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If all questions are treated equally without differentiation, then the system can process any question uniformly, but the system cannot identify relationships between questions or determine their relative difficulty

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequestion processingVSAvoidquestion relationships
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments questions into distinct components and hierarchical levels within the question graph structure. By dividing questions into parameters, relationships, and nested sub-questions, the system can process each segment uniformly while simultaneously preserving the relationships between segments. This segmentation enables both ease of processing and retention of question relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds a structural dimension to question representation by creating question graphs with hierarchical levels and relationship types. This dimensional transformation allows the system to maintain uniform processing procedures while capturing question relationships and difficulty variations through the added structural dimension, preventing information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If a hierarchical knowledge taxonomy is implemented to grade question complexity and relationships, then the system can identify relevant content and improve accuracy, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent retrieval accuracyVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hierarchical knowledge taxonomy is segmented into distinct levels and question graph components, allowing the system to apply complexity grading selectively to relevant elements rather than the entire system. This segmentation enables precise measurement of question and content relationships while keeping the overall system structure manageable through modular organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11934793B2System and method for content comprehension and response
Publication Date: 2024.03.19 SRI INTERNATIONAL
  • US11934793B2 patent drawing
  • US11934793B2 patent drawing
  • US11934793B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, apparatus and system for training an embedding space for content comprehension and response includes, for each layer of a hierarchical taxonomy having at least two layers including respective words resulting in layers of varying complexity, determining a set of words associated with a layer of the hierarchical taxonomy, determining a question answer pair based on a question generated using at least one word of the set of words and at least one content domain, determining a vector representation for the generated question and for content related to the at least one content domain of the question answer pair, and embedding the question vector representation and the content vector representations into a common embedding space where vector representations that are related, are closer in the embedding space than unrelated embedded vector representations. Requests for content can then be fulfilled using the trained, common embedding space.