Embossed PCB Stencil Mask Structure for Uniform Cavity Printing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Stencil masks for printing solder paste into cavities of printed circuit boards (PCBs) are prone to bending, leading to non-uniform solder paste patterns and reduced reliability of electrical components mounted in the cavities.

Innovation Solution

A stencil mask design featuring a non-reinforcement portion and a reinforcement portion with a greater thickness, where the reinforcement portion includes an embossed surface for insertion into the cavity and contacts the cavity bottom surface, ensuring alignment and stability during printing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional stencil mask is used for printing solder paste into cavities, then the mask can be easily manufactured and operated, but the mask bends during printing, resulting in non-uniform solder paste patterns and reduced reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of stencil maskVSAvoidstructure complexity of stencil mask
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The stencil mask is segmented into three distinct portions: a first portion for contacting the substrate surface, a second portion extending into the cavity with greater thickness, and a third portion for contacting the cavity bottom surface. This segmentation allows each portion to perform its specific function independently, preventing bending while maintaining manufacturability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the stencil mask have different thicknesses and material properties optimized for their specific locations. The second portion has greater thickness for structural support in the cavity region, while other portions maintain standard thickness for flexibility and manufacturability. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between reliability and complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If the stencil mask thickness is increased to prevent bending, then the mask reliability improves, but the manufacturing complexity and material usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability of stencil maskVSAvoidmaterial usage of stencil mask
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The stencil mask employs varying thickness across different portions rather than uniformly increasing thickness throughout. The second portion has greater thickness for stability, while the first and third portions maintain standard thickness, optimizing material usage while achieving the required reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

By dividing the mask into segments with different thickness requirements, the design applies material only where structurally necessary. The segmented approach ensures material efficiency by concentrating reinforcement in the cavity region where bending resistance is critical

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Manufacturing precision

If a reinforcement portion with greater thickness is added to the stencil mask, then bending is prevented and printing uniformity improves, but the device structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniformity of solder paste patternVSAvoidstructural complexity of stencil mask
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement portion is segmented as a distinct second portion with specific geometric characteristics (greater thickness) that enable it to prevent bending. This segmentation isolates the complexity to only the region where it is needed for achieving printing uniformity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The solution addresses the bending problem by adding thickness in the vertical dimension rather than increasing lateral dimensions. The second portion extends vertically into the cavity with greater thickness, providing structural support without significantly increasing the overall footprint or lateral complexity of the mask

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS12538433B2Stencil mask and stencil printing method
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 STATS CHIPPAC LTD
  • US12538433B2 patent drawing
  • US12538433B2 patent drawing
  • US12538433B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A stencil mask and a stencil printing method are provided. The stencil mask includes: a non-reinforcement portion having a mask surface configured to contact a substrate surface of a substrate; and a reinforcement portion having a thickness greater than that of the non-reinforcement portion, wherein the reinforcement portion includes: an embossed surface for insertion into a cavity of the substrate and configured to contact a cavity bottom surface when the stencil mask is placed onto the substrate for stencil printing; and at least one first stencil window that allows the fluid material to flow through the reinforcement portion, wherein the at least one first stencil window is aligned with at least one printing region within the cavity when the stencil mask is placed onto the substrate for stencil printing.