Emergency Exit Assembly with Flexible Cable Release

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In care homes, existing emergency exit assemblies are inadequate as they either rely on electric power that may fail during emergencies or require complex key systems that are difficult to manage, failing to ensure restricted access while allowing residents to exit freely.

Innovation Solution

An emergency exit assembly featuring first and second push-button units connected by an elongate flexible means, where the first unit releases one end of the connecting means for staff to withdraw, and the second unit, mounted on the door, releases the other end using a biased mechanism allowing easy ejection, ensuring staff can open the door without needing both hands.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If electrically powered assemblies are used to control door access, then access control functionality is achieved, but reliability deteriorates due to potential power failure during emergencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess control functionalityVSAvoiddoor opening reliability during emergency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into two independent push-button units connected by a flexible cable. The first unit (externally mounted) and second unit (internally mounted) can operate independently to release the door, eliminating dependency on electrical power while maintaining access control functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanism uses spring-loaded push-buttons that are mechanically self-actuating. When either button is pressed, it mechanically releases the locking mechanism through the flexible cable connection, requiring no external power source and ensuring operation during emergencies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If key-based assemblies are used to restrict access, then access security is improved, but device complexity increases due to key management requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess securityVSAvoidkey management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex key management system is extracted and replaced with a simple mechanical push-button release mechanism. The essential function of restricting access is maintained through the default locked state, while the complicating factor of key distribution and management is completely removed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces durable but complex key systems with simple, inexpensive push-button mechanisms. The focus shifts from long-term key management to simple, replaceable mechanical components that can be easily reset or replaced if needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Ease of operation

If a mechanical release mechanism is provided for the connecting means, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor opening easeVSAvoidmechanical mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using a complex mechanism to lock the door and a simple button to unlock it, the system uses a simple push-button that, when pressed, mechanically releases the locking state through the flexible cable connection. The complexity is inverted by making the release mechanism the primary control element

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides a reliable and user-friendly mechanism for staff to open doors while restricting unauthorized access, ensuring residents can exit freely during emergencies without requiring complex key management or electricity.

Implementation Method 1

The release member may be in the form of a plate. The release member may be mounted in a recess formed in the body. The recess may additionally containing biasing means, such as a leaf spring. The biasing means may urge the release member against the toggle member.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

A biasing member, for example in the form of a coil spring, may be positioned within the body, for example within the second opening in the body, to eject the connecting means from of the second push-button unit when released.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP3034729B1Emergency exit assembly
Publication Date: 2017.11.15 LANE ANDREW JOHN
  • EP3034729B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3034729B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5
  • EP3034729B1 patent drawingFigure 6~8

AI summary

An emergency exit assembly comprises first (1) and second (5, 105) push-button units and an elongate flexible connecting means (3) to connect the push-button units. The first push-button unit (1) is adapted on operation to release a first end (9) of the connecting means (3) to allow the connecting means to be withdrawn from the first push-button unit when released. The second push-button unit (5, 105) is adapted on operation to release and eject a second end (11) of the connecting means from the second push-button unit.