Automated Emergency Generator Fuel Oil System with Return Pump

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional emergency generator fuel oil delivery systems lack full automation, remote monitoring, and the ability to return unused fuel for reuse, requiring manual operation and frequent testing, which is inefficient and prone to errors.

Innovation Solution

A fully automated system with a master control panel that electronically monitors and manages all aspects of the fuel oil delivery, including fluid levels, pressures, and filtration, allowing for remote operation, automatic testing, and the return of unused fuel to storage tanks for cleaning and reuse, with components designed to withstand seismic events.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual operation is used for fuel oil delivery systems, then the system structure is simple, but the labor cost is high and operational efficiency is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical operations with an automated control system that uses electronic sensors, programmable logic controllers, and automated valves to monitor and adjust fuel oil delivery, filtration, and return operations, thereby increasing productivity while managing system complexity through integration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates self-monitoring capabilities where sensors continuously track fuel levels, filtration status, and system parameters, automatically initiating corrective actions such as filtering or returning fuel without human intervention, enabling the system to serve itself and improve operational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If frequent manual testing and certification are performed, then system reliability is ensured, but loss of time and operational disruption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated testing and self-diagnosis continuously during normal operation, monitoring fuel levels, filtration effectiveness, and system integrity in real-time, so that reliability is maintained proactively without requiring frequent separate manual testing interruptions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates continuous feedback loops where sensors monitor system parameters and automatically adjust operations or alert operators to issues, enabling real-time reliability assurance without the need for periodic manual certification testing that causes operational disruption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of substance

If unused fuel is discarded instead of returned for reuse, then the system operation is simple, but substance loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel lossVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a fuel recovery mechanism that automatically returns unused fuel from the delivery system back to the storage tank through a dedicated return line and pump, where it can be filtered and reused, thereby minimizing fuel loss while managing the added complexity through integrated design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

The return pump and filtration system serve multiple functions: they return unused fuel to storage, filter contaminants from the fuel, and can optionally dispose of contaminated fuel, making the system versatile in managing fuel resources and reducing substance loss through multi-functional components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of operation

If remote monitoring and automated control are implemented, then ease of operation improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational convenienceVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a programmable logic controller as an intermediary that manages the complexity of automated operations, remote monitoring, and coordination between various system components, allowing operators to interact with the system through simple interfaces while the intermediary handles the complex control logic automatically

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9371774B2Fully automated emergency generator fuel oil system and method for operation thereof
Publication Date: 2016.06.21 LESCURE MICHAEL
  • US9371774B2 patent drawing
  • US9371774B2 patent drawing
  • US9371774B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fully automated emergency generator fuel oil system comprises a plurality of emergency generator fuel oil system components, a plurality of sensors for continuously monitoring the physical status of the system components, and a master control panel in communication with the plurality of sensors, wherein a master control panel in operative communication with the system components interprets signals received from the plurality of sensors to determine if an event has occurred, an event indicating the physical status of one or more of the system components, and when an event has occurred, the master control panel issues one or more instructions responsive to the event that control the function of one or more of the system components.