Emergency Lighting Fault Indicators for Clear Battery Replacement Diagnosis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing emergency lighting units require time-consuming and costly processes to diagnose faults, with complex blinking codes that can be confusing for users, especially those who are color blind, and lack clear indication of when a battery or the entire unit needs replacement.

Innovation Solution

An emergency lighting device with a simplified fault indication system using a diffuser and three indicator lights (bi-color LED, replace battery indicator, and replace unit indicator) that provides clear visual signals through specific blinking patterns or symbols, eliminating the need for reference cards and accommodating color blindness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If complex blinking codes are used to indicate faults, then more fault information can be conveyed, but users find it confusing and time-consuming to diagnose

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault informationVSAvoidfault diagnosis
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The fault indication system is segmented into three distinct indicator lights, each responsible for indicating specific fault conditions. This segmentation allows complex fault information to be broken down into simple, easily distinguishable visual signals that users can interpret at a glance without confusion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a bi-color LED that can change colors (red and green) to indicate different fault states, combined with two additional indicator lights. This color-coding system provides intuitive visual cues that are easily distinguishable and accommodate color blindness through multiple visual channels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

2Measurement precision

If multiple indicator lights are used to indicate different faults, then fault identification becomes more accurate, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault identificationVSAvoidindication system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The indication system is divided into three separate indicator lights, each dedicated to specific fault types. This segmentation provides precise fault identification while keeping each individual indicator simple and the overall system manageable in complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The bi-color LED serves multiple functions by displaying different colors for different fault conditions, effectively performing the work of multiple single-color LEDs while reducing the total number of components needed in the system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of information

If reference cards are required to interpret fault codes, then comprehensive fault information can be provided, but diagnostic time and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault code informationVSAvoiddiagnostic time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The fault indication system is designed to be self-explanatory through intuitive visual cues and symbols that users can interpret without external reference materials. The system serves itself by providing immediately understandable feedback that eliminates the need for separate documentation or reference cards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The use of color-coded indicators with symbolic representations creates an universally understandable language for fault indication that does not require translation through reference cards, allowing users to quickly comprehend fault conditions through immediate visual recognition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

4Device complexity

If traditional fault indication methods are used, then device simplicity is maintained, but accessibility for color blind users is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindication systemVSAvoidaccessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses three distinct indicator lights that provide multiple visual channels for fault indication, allowing information to be conveyed through patterns, positions, and combinations rather than relying solely on color differentiation, thus improving accessibility while maintaining simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

While the system includes color changes in the bi-color LED, it complements this with additional non-color-based indicators and symbolic representations on the diffuser, creating a multi-modal indication system that maintains simplicity while significantly improving accessibility for color blind users

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Facilitates easy and immediate identification of fault types, reducing diagnostic time and costs by providing clear visual cues for users, ensuring timely maintenance and improving accessibility.

Implementation Method 1

a diffuser positioned over the first, second, and third indicator lights. The diffuser has a first symbol indicating a first fault and a second symbol indicating a second fault

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight transmission through diffuser: Refraction

Data Source

PatentUS11811260B2Self-diagnostic fault identification system for emergency lighting unit
Publication Date: 2023.11.07 HLI SOLUTIONS INC
  • US11811260B2 patent drawing
  • US11811260B2 patent drawing
  • US11811260B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An emergency lighting device includes a housing, a light emitter positioned in the housing, a control circuit positioned in the housing and operatively connected to the light emitter, an indicator light positioned in the housing, and a fault indicator circuit positioned in the housing and operatively connected to the indicator light. The fault indicator circuit is configured to monitor the light emitter, analyze activation of the light emitter, and activate the indicator light based on the analysis of the activation of the light emitter.