Emergency Medical Data Registry for Unconscious Patient Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems fail to securely and efficiently share emergency medical data with healthcare providers during medical emergencies, particularly when patients are unconscious, due to limitations in existing data access protocols and lack of integration with medical data storage systems.

Innovation Solution

A secure online data sharing network is established, allowing patients to validate and authenticate their identity, consent to share emergency medical data, and provide access to licensed healthcare workers through a smartphone-based system, using multi-factor authentication and a registry for emergency medical data, ensuring secure and timely access to critical health information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing data access protocols are used, then patient privacy is protected, but emergency medical data cannot be accessed timely when patients are unconscious

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient privacy protectionVSAvoidtime to access emergency medical data
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by obtaining patient consent in advance and storing emergency contact information and medical data in a registry before emergencies occur. When a patient is unconscious, the system can immediately access pre-authorized data without requiring real-time consent, thus resolving the contradiction between privacy protection and timely access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary emergency data registry system that mediates between patient privacy requirements and emergency access needs. The registry acts as a trusted intermediary that holds pre-authorized emergency information and releases it to healthcare providers when needed, eliminating the need for real-time patient interaction while maintaining privacy controls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multi-factor authentication is implemented, then data security is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoidauthentication system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication system is segmented into multiple independent factors (knowledge-based questions, biometric verification, device identifiers) that can be evaluated separately. This segmentation allows the system to implement robust multi-factor authentication while maintaining modularity and manageability, reducing the perceived complexity through structured organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If emergency medical data is made accessible, then patient care quality improves, but risk of data misuse increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient care qualityVSAvoidrisk of data misuse
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements local quality by providing different levels of data access to different authorized entities based on their specific needs and roles. Healthcare providers receive only the minimum necessary emergency information required for treatment, while maintaining stricter access controls for other entities. This selective data disclosure improves care quality while minimizing exposure to misuse risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11928197B2Method for providing an authenticated digital identity
Publication Date: 2024.03.12 KRAGH JAMES F
  • US11928197B2 patent drawing
  • US11928197B2 patent drawing
  • US11928197B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for verifying and validating identifiable attributes of a user includes electronically receiving the attributes of a user and verifying their authenticity. The attributes are also validated by confirming each matches a corresponding evidenced based attribute. An internal unique identity number is assigned in concert with authenticated user attributes. Access to the identifiable attributes having the identifier is only permitted by the user or a designee of the user. A level of confidence is established from a ranking of the validated attributes. An authenticated digital identity is then formed from the identifiable validated attributes, and a level of confidence for the authenticated digital identity is established from the ranking.