Emergency Vehicle Geofencing Based on Driving Intent

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional emergency vehicle alert systems fail to effectively determine the appropriate size or shape of a geofence based on the intent of the emergency vehicle, leading to inadequate or unnecessary alerts and potential safety risks for both emergency vehicles and other road users.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that dynamically configures the size and shape of a geofence for emergency vehicles based on their working mode, which includes normal and emergency modes, using a processor to generate and transmit the geofence to surrounding vehicles, and adjusts the geofence size or shape according to the degree of emergency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional audio or visual signaling devices are used to alert other vehicles, then emergency vehicle alerts are provided, but the alerts may be inadequate, unnecessary, or easily ignored by drivers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert effectivenessVSAvoidsafety risks from ignored alerts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The geofence dynamically adjusts its size, shape, and direction based on the emergency vehicle's working mode (normal, emergency, high emergency) and operational intent, transforming static alert boundaries into adaptive zones that respond to real-time conditions, thereby improving alert reliability and reducing safety risks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key parameters of the geofence including size, shape, and direction according to the emergency vehicle's operational state. In normal mode, the geofence is smaller; in emergency mode, it expands; and in high emergency mode with officers exposed, it expands further to cover additional safety zones, making alerts more appropriate and effective

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If a fixed-size geofence is used for emergency vehicles, then implementation is simple, but the geofence may be too large causing unnecessary alerts or too small providing inadequate protection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem implementation simplicityVSAvoidalert appropriateness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The geofence transitions from a fixed static boundary to a dynamic adaptive zone that automatically adjusts its characteristics based on the emergency vehicle's working mode and intent, resolving the contradiction between implementation simplicity and alert appropriateness through automated context-aware configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system determines the emergency vehicle's working mode automatically based on sensor data and operational context, then self-configures the appropriate geofence parameters without requiring manual intervention, maintaining ease of implementation while achieving reliable alert appropriateness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If the geofence size is increased to cover more areas, then more vehicles receive alerts, but unnecessary alerts are generated for vehicles not on the emergency vehicle's path

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemergency vehicle safetyVSAvoidalert precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The geofence is configured with different sizes, shapes, and directions tailored to specific local conditions and emergency vehicle intents. For example, when the intent is to stop on the right side of the road, the geofence is configured to alert vehicles on the right; when the intent is to pass through, the geofence expands to alert vehicles in the path, achieving both safety and precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The geofence dynamically adapts its spatial characteristics based on the emergency vehicle's intended action, expanding or contracting to match the actual safety zone required, thereby preventing both under-protection and over-alerting

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Device complexity

If the geofence is configured without considering emergency vehicle intent, then configuration is straightforward, but the geofence may not prevent officer strikes or vehicle collisions when stopped on roadside

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeofence configuration complexityVSAvoidofficer and vehicle safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines the emergency vehicle's working mode by analyzing sensor data and operational context, then self-configures the appropriate geofence parameters. This self-service approach maintains configuration simplicity while achieving the reliability needed to prevent officer strikes and vehicle collisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses sensor feedback from the emergency vehicle's operational state to automatically adjust geofence configuration. When sensors detect that the vehicle is stopped with officers exposed, the system feedback-loop adjusts the geofence to expand and cover the appropriate safety zones, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12574703B2System and method for intent-based geofencing for emergency vehicle
Publication Date: 2026.03.10 WHELEN ENGINEERING COMPANY
  • US12574703B2 patent drawing
  • US12574703B2 patent drawing
  • US12574703B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system, method and storage medium for providing an emergency vehicle (EV) alert includes generating a geofence by varying a size or shape of the geofence according to a working mode of an EV and transmitting the generated geofence to another vehicle.