Autonomous Vehicle Operation Modification During Emergency Events

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles lack the ability to detect and respond to emergency situations, resulting in suboptimal operation and potential inefficiencies in emergency scenarios.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that detect emergency events, assess the operation of autonomous vehicles, determine necessary operation modifications, and generate vehicle control instructions to facilitate optimal operation in emergency situations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If autonomous vehicles operate according to standard regulations, then operational compliance is maintained, but emergency response efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemergency response efficiencyVSAvoidoperational compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts vehicle operation parameters based on detected emergency situations. The computing device modifies speed limits, routing, and traffic signal compliance in real-time when emergencies are detected, allowing the vehicle to transition from static regulatory compliance to dynamic emergency-responsive operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters such as maximum speed, route selection, and traffic signal adherence based on emergency detection. When an emergency situation is detected, the system modifies these parameters to prioritize emergency response while maintaining necessary safety constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If autonomous vehicles prioritize emergency response, then emergency situation handling improves, but standard operational safety may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemergency situation handlingVSAvoidoperational safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different safety standards to different spatial and temporal contexts. During emergency situations, the system relaxes safety constraints only in the specific context of emergency response while maintaining standard safety protocols for all other operational contexts. This localized adjustment allows emergency prioritization without compromising overall safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors operational conditions and adjusts safety parameters based on real-time feedback from the environment. Safety constraints are dynamically modified based on the detected situation, allowing the vehicle to respond appropriately to emergencies while maintaining safety through continuous environmental assessment and adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If autonomous vehicles lack emergency detection capability, then system complexity is reduced, but operational effectiveness in emergencies deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational effectiveness in emergenciesVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the existing multi-functional sensors and computing infrastructure of the autonomous vehicle to perform emergency detection in addition to their primary navigation and obstacle detection functions. This universal use of existing components adds emergency response capability without requiring entirely separate dedicated systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-establishes emergency response protocols and detection algorithms that can be rapidly activated when emergencies are detected. By preparing response frameworks in advance, the system can quickly transition to emergency mode without adding complex real-time decision-making structures during critical moments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12217605B2Technology for situational modification of autonomous vehicle operation
Publication Date: 2025.02.04 STATE FARM MUTAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
  • US12217605B2 patent drawing
  • US12217605B2 patent drawing
  • US12217605B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for situational modification of autonomous vehicle operation are disclosed. According to aspects, a computing device may detect the occurrence of an emergency event and may determine a current operation of an autonomous vehicle that may be associated with the emergency event. The computing device may determine a modification to operation of the autonomous vehicle, where the modification may represent a violation of a roadway regulation that may enable effective handling of the emergency event. The computing device may generate a set of instructions for the autonomous vehicle to execute to cause the autonomous vehicle to undertake the operation modification.