Emergency Warning Service with Segmented User Agreements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mobile communication systems lack a service that is beneficial to both users and providers during emergency situations, failing to effectively provide targeted and actionable information to users while also offering a financial benefit to service operators.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for an emergency warning service that involves establishing a service agreement with users, transmitting emergency-related information based on the agreement, and providing additional helping information upon request, utilizing broadcasting methods like cell broadcast service to reach users within a specific area, allowing operators to charge for premium services and reduce unnecessary warnings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If emergency warning messages are transmitted to all users without service agreements, then user safety is improved, but service providers cannot generate revenue and system resources are wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser safetyVSAvoidservice provider revenue loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments users into different categories based on their subscription status and emergency warning preferences. Users are divided into those with active service agreements who receive full emergency warnings and those without agreements who receive filtered or reduced warnings. This segmentation allows the system to maintain safety for paying users while generating revenue from the service provider.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different warning transmission strategies to different user groups based on their service agreements. Users with active agreements receive comprehensive emergency warnings in their local areas, while users without agreements receive filtered information. This local differentiation ensures high reliability for subscribed users while enabling revenue generation for the provider.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If emergency warnings are transmitted to all users regardless of location or preference, then coverage is improved, but unnecessary alerts increase causing user annoyance and resource waste

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemergency warning coverageVSAvoidunnecessary alerts
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements location-based filtering where emergency warnings are selectively transmitted based on the user's geographical location relative to the emergency event. Users located within the affected area receive warnings, while users outside the affected area receive filtered or no warnings. This local quality approach maintains comprehensive coverage for those who need it while eliminating unnecessary alerts for others.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts warning transmission based on real-time emergency status and user preferences. The system can activate or deactivate warning transmission to specific user groups based on the current emergency situation, ensuring comprehensive coverage when needed while reducing unnecessary alerts during lower-risk periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If comprehensive emergency information is provided to all users, then user safety is improved, but service provider revenue is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser safetyVSAvoidservice provider revenue
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the user base into premium subscribers who receive comprehensive emergency information and free users who receive filtered information. This segmentation allows the provider to offer comprehensive safety services to paying users while generating revenue from the subscription model, rather than providing comprehensive services to all users uniformly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The service agreement acts as an intermediary mechanism that mediates between the provider's revenue needs and the user's safety requirements. Users who value comprehensive emergency information can subscribe to the service, while those who do not need comprehensive coverage can use the filtered free version, allowing the system to balance revenue generation with safety provision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Quantity of substance

If selective warning transmission based on service agreements is implemented, then provider revenue is improved, but user safety may be compromised for non-subscribers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice provider revenueVSAvoiduser safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different levels of warning transmission to different user groups based on their service status. Subscribers receive comprehensive warnings ensuring their safety, while non-subscribers receive filtered warnings that still provide basic safety information. This local quality approach ensures that subscribers receive full safety services while non-subscribers still benefit from basic warning transmission, balancing revenue generation with public safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP1872347B1Emergency warning service
Publication Date: 2012.05.23 LIDGREN LARS
  • EP1872347B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1872347B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP1872347B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

An emergency warning service is described for providing emergency related information to users of communication terminals in a mobile communication system. The service comprises a procedure of establishing a service agreement in relation with a user. The service agreement comprises at least an identification of a user and a time period during which period the user is allowed access to emergency warnings. After receiving an emergency warning message from an emergency warning message provider, the message comprising information at least regarding a type of emergency and an emergency location, it is decided whether or not the user is to receive the warning message. The decision is based at least on said service agreement. Then, depending on the decision, at least said warning message is transmitted to the user.