EMG Sensor Electrode Selection via Signal Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

It is challenging for individuals lacking anatomical knowledge to accurately attach electromyography (EMG) sensors to the correct location on the skin surface for effective signal measurement, as the quality of biological signals such as EMG, EKG, and EEG is heavily dependent on the sensor's position.

Innovation Solution

A device comprising electrodes and a control unit that selects optimal electrode combinations by comparing signal sizes, using a bracelet to support electrodes and a guide unit to provide movement patterns for muscle contraction and relaxation, ensuring consistent signal measurement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple electrodes are used to measure biological signals, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal qualityVSAvoidelectrode combination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary testing of multiple electrode combinations before actual measurement. The control unit automatically tests different electrode pairings and identifies the optimal combination in advance, so that when measurement is needed, the best electrodes are already selected and ready for use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system is self-configuring and self-optimizing. The control unit automatically selects the best electrode combinations without requiring manual intervention or anatomical knowledge from the user. The system serves itself by autonomously determining optimal electrode placements based on actual signal quality measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If automatic electrode selection is implemented, then ease of operation is improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor attachment easeVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs electrode combination testing only partially or selectively - not all possible combinations are tested exhaustively. Instead, the control unit tests a sufficient number of combinations to identify the optimal pairing, balancing the need for automatic selection with energy conservation considerations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If signal size comparison is used to determine optimal electrodes, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode selection accuracyVSAvoidelectrode selection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The optimal electrode combination is determined in advance through preliminary testing and signal comparison. Once the best combination is identified during the setup phase, it is stored and reused for subsequent measurements, avoiding repeated time-consuming comparisons during actual use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10085669B2Sensor system and method of operating the same
Publication Date: 2018.10.02 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US10085669B2 patent drawing
  • US10085669B2 patent drawing
  • US10085669B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a device for measuring a signal and a method of operating the same. The device may include electrodes attached to the device, and a control unit for determining the optimal pair of electrodes to be used for measuring the signal. Also, the device may include an output unit for measuring signals that are sensed by the electrodes.