EMI Detection Circuit for Modulated Light Signal Differentiation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modulated light detection systems face challenges in distinguishing between modulated light and electromagnetic interference (EMI), leading to incorrect electrical responses due to the difficulty in completely preventing EMI from entering the signal chain.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating an EMI detection circuit and a decision-making controller in the modulated light detection system to differentiate between EMI and modulated light signals, allowing for the generation of outputs that modify or negate the electrical response to ensure accurate detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If EMI detection circuit and decision-making controller are added to differentiate EMI from modulated light signals, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidcircuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the detection function into two independent circuits: a photo-sensitive element for detecting modulated light signals and an EMI detection circuit for detecting electromagnetic interference. This segmentation allows each circuit to be optimized for its specific detection task, improving overall reliability while maintaining manageable complexity through functional separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The decision-making controller acts as an intermediary that receives inputs from both the photo-sensitive element and the EMI detection circuit. It processes these inputs and generates an output signal only when modulated light is detected and EMI is absent, thereby resolving the contradiction by introducing a intelligent mediation layer that enhances reliability without proportionally increasing hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If shielding and filtering techniques are used to prevent EMI from entering the signal chain, then reliability is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanti-EMI capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs active self-service through the EMI detection circuit that autonomously monitors for electromagnetic interference and provides feedback to the decision-making controller. This self-monitoring mechanism achieves reliable EMI rejection without requiring complex passive shielding structures, thereby improving anti-EMI capability while maintaining ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If the system generates output in response to any electrical signal, then productivity is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to false alarms from EMI

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection speedVSAvoidfalse alarm rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by having the EMI detection circuit continuously monitor for electromagnetic interference before the decision-making controller generates an output. This preliminary detection allows the system to preemptively prevent false alarms by blocking outputs when EMI is present, thereby maintaining high detection speed while eliminating false positives through advance verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The decision-making controller implements feedback by receiving real-time inputs from both the photo-sensitive element and the EMI detection circuit. It dynamically adjusts its output generation based on the combined state of these inputs, producing an output only when modulated light is detected and EMI is absent. This feedback mechanism ensures high productivity while maintaining reliability by continuously verifying signal authenticity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively mitigates the impact of EMI, preventing false alarms and ensuring the reliability of modulated light detection by accurately distinguishing between EMI and intended modulated light signals, thereby improving system performance.

Implementation Method 1

The photo-sensitive element is configured to generate an electrical signal in response to modulated light

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric effect: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

The electromagnetic interference (EMI) detection circuit is configured to generate an electrical signal in response to EMI

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS10651934B2System and method of mitigating electromagnetic interference (EMI) in modulated light detection systems
Publication Date: 2020.05.12 ATTOLLO ENGINEERING LLC
  • US10651934B2 patent drawing
  • US10651934B2 patent drawing
  • US10651934B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A modulated light receiver includes a photo-sensitive element, an electromagnetic interference (EMI) detection circuit, and a decision-making controller. The photo-sensitive element is configured to generate an electrical signal in response to modulated light. The electromagnetic interference (EMI) detection circuit is configured to generate an electrical signal in response to EMI. The decision-making controller is electrically coupled to the photo-sensitive element and the EMI detection circuit, wherein the decision-making controller generates an output based on the inputs received from the photo-sensitive element and the EMI detection circuit.